From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from out3.smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.27]) by speech.braille.uwo.ca with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1JWq6n-0007oF-00 for ; Wed, 05 Mar 2008 04:40:21 -0500 Received: from compute2.internal (compute2.internal [10.202.2.42]) by out1.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0827EAEB0C for ; Wed, 5 Mar 2008 04:40:21 -0500 (EST) Received: from heartbeat1.messagingengine.com ([10.202.2.160]) by compute2.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 05 Mar 2008 04:40:21 -0500 X-Sasl-enc: rXdjPl+O+kmhQhYm6V33Tuwx+df2tOtSwrNTX1o3Y+bR 1204710020 Received: from cq.ftml.net (24-105-220-93.cm.mhcable.com [24.105.220.93]) by www.fastmail.fm (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A65ED80EC for ; Wed, 5 Mar 2008 04:40:20 -0500 (EST) Received: from chuckh by cq.ftml.net with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1JWq6m-0004Op-AP for speakup@braille.uwo.ca; Wed, 05 Mar 2008 04:40:20 -0500 Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2008 04:40:20 -0500 From: Chuck Hallenbeck To: "Speakup is a screen review system for Linux." Subject: Re: software speech problem after latest also upgrade Message-ID: <20080305094020.GA16855@cq.ftml.net> Mail-Followup-To: "Speakup is a screen review system for Linux." References: <20080305010636.GA6396@cq.ftml.net> <20080305033712.GA8363@localhost.localdomain> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; x-action=pgp-signed Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080305033712.GA8363@localhost.localdomain> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17+20080114 (2008-01-14) X-BeenThere: speakup@braille.uwo.ca X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list Reply-To: "Speakup is a screen review system for Linux." List-Id: "Speakup is a screen review system for Linux." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Mar 2008 09:40:21 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi Greg, > > I'm confused here. My impression was that the espeak module (I mean > espeak, not espeak-generic) provided with speech-dispatcher did away > with generating wav files, and espeak send the text to be spoken to > the audio hardware directly, rather than generating a wav file, which > was later played back, as is the case in the espeak-generic module. Am > I wrong on this? > Sorry about that: I use the espeak-generic module. On my system for some reason when I use the newer espeak module, some of my oss packages fail to be able to open the sound device. Chuck - -- The Moon is Waning Crescent (7% of Full) My web site is: http://hallenbeck.ftml.net, my phone is: 1-518-334-9022, and sometimes I Jabber. My JID is: chuckh@jabber.org -------- For every vision there is an equal and opposite revision. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFHzmqE0maTgpPXM9cRAjX9AJ9YkKDWSYiEh8iW929pkzg5TzhUDACfSP8s QVrIWZfbnQxGdlzeFIryfOk= =pEXf -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----