From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from hittsjunk.net ([74.93.63.217] helo=blackbox.hittsjunk.net) by speech.braille.uwo.ca with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1IJX7H-0001Eb-00 for ; Fri, 10 Aug 2007 12:13:35 -0400 Received: from kenny by blackbox.hittsjunk.net with local (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1IJX9W-0002L1-Vs for speakup@braille.uwo.ca; Fri, 10 Aug 2007 11:15:54 -0500 Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2007 11:15:53 -0500 From: Kenny Hitt To: speakup@braille.uwo.ca Subject: Re: My Views Regarding Kernel Vs. Userspace Message-ID: <20070810161551.GC22729@hittsjunk.net> Mail-Followup-To: speakup@braille.uwo.ca References: <547A6BB1380944E0945B7990CA9B182B@Michelle> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <547A6BB1380944E0945B7990CA9B182B@Michelle> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-11) X-BeenThere: speakup@braille.uwo.ca X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list Reply-To: "Speakup is a screen review system for Linux." List-Id: "Speakup is a screen review system for Linux." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2007 16:13:35 -0000 Hi. Your problem is a good argument for keeping speakup in kernel space. If you had been running a user space screen reader, you wouldn't have known about your problem since the screen reader would never have been started. Kenny