From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from ns.pcdesk.net ([65.100.173.137] helo=pcdesk.net) by speech.braille.uwo.ca with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1HT4cH-00063m-00 for ; Sun, 18 Mar 2007 19:16:45 -0400 Received: from localhost ([::ffff:70.68.38.175]) (AUTH: LOGIN tspivey@pcdesk.net) by pcdesk.net with esmtp; Sun, 18 Mar 2007 17:15:50 -0600 id 018003C0.45FDC826.00007ABC Date: Sun, 18 Mar 2007 16:16:13 -0700 From: Tyler Spivey To: "Speakup is a screen review system for Linux." Subject: Re: grml spelling issues Message-ID: <20070318231613.GB83329@fajrero> References: <2007-03-17T12-56-17@devnull.michael-prokop.at> <001d01c768d3$64c8ae10$250110ac@CHIHUAHUAD1> <20070317211243.GA21012@localhost.localdomain> <002b01c768ee$2ba00140$250110ac@CHIHUAHUAD1> <2007-03-18T15-54-56@devnull.michael-prokop.at> <1174248183.3368.23.camel@chopin> <2007-03-18T23-36-32@devnull.michael-prokop.at> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; x-action=pgp-signed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <2007-03-18T23-36-32@devnull.michael-prokop.at> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) X-BeenThere: speakup@braille.uwo.ca X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list Reply-To: "Speakup is a screen review system for Linux." List-Id: "Speakup is a screen review system for Linux." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Mar 2007 23:16:46 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 I have a modified espeak-generic.conf at http://tspivey.freeshell.org/espeak-generic.conf. You might want to modify it again so that it goes through the sox play command, since the one I have sort of chops - I'm not sure about the latest version of espeak. I think the blank line deletion still stands - speech dispatcher sometimes sends just blank lines to espeak, which causes it to pause. - - Tyler On Sun, Mar 18, 2007 at 11:45:10PM +0100, Michael Prokop wrote: > * Hynek Hanke wrote: > > Michael Prokop p??e v Ne 18. 03. 2007 v 15:59 +0100: > > >> "I however find Espeak does not sound quite as clear to me. I like > >> the current synthesizer that is being used." > >> What benefit would espeak bring compared to eflite? > > > Compared to eFlite, eSpeak is a multi-lingual synthesizer. > > Although the quality of languages is very variable, it is possible to > > use it for MANY languages in a way that it is understandable (useful). > > The span is even wider than documented, because for example for Czech it > > is possible to use it with the Polish voice and understand it. I believe > > this is the case for other close languages too. And I'm amazed on how > > fast voices for new languages are being added, although of only basic > > quality. eFlite is nowhere near this... > > Ok, thanks. > > >> Disclaimer: I can't promise anything regarding adding espeak. We are > >> running out of space so the ISO fits within 700MB on grml always... > > > If necessary for disk space reasons, I highly recommend dropping Flite > > in favor of eSpeak. > > Ok. When I'm removing libflite1, besides flite and eflite also > brltty-flite and speech-dispatcher will disappear. This would bring > me >15MB of disk space whereas espeak needs only 1200kB at total, so > definitely appreciated from my side. > > But I've to take a look at espeak and its configuration first of > all. Any help and feedback regarding espeak's configuration on grml > is highly welcome. > > -mika- > -- > ,'"`. http://www.michael-prokop.at/ > ( grml.org -? Linux Live-CD for texttool-users and sysadmins > `._,' http://www.grml.org/ > > > _______________________________________________ > Speakup mailing list > Speakup@braille.uwo.ca > http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFF/cg8TsjaYASMWKQRAhxkAJ91wnuw8mwAgOwvKsQwNuyY7iXsPwCfWpmB pgaKTf15wBZaRgrGpF9auyc= =JcHS -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----