From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from fed1rmmtao102.cox.net ([68.230.241.44]) by speech.braille.uwo.ca with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1HMEpN-0006U7-00 for ; Tue, 27 Feb 2007 21:46:01 -0500 Received: from fed1rmimpo02.cox.net ([70.169.32.72]) by fed1rmmtao102.cox.net (InterMail vM.7.05.02.00 201-2174-114-20060621) with ESMTP id <20070228024530.YBKV2670.fed1rmmtao102.cox.net@fed1rmimpo02.cox.net> for ; Tue, 27 Feb 2007 21:45:30 -0500 Received: from lnx2.holmesgrown.com ([70.162.12.128]) by fed1rmimpo02.cox.net with bizsmtp id UqlW1W01F2lltDi0000000; Tue, 27 Feb 2007 21:45:30 -0500 Received: from lnx3.holmesgrown.com ([192.168.1.5] ident=mail) by lnx2.holmesgrown.com with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1HMEtY-0004Bm-VB for speakup@braille.uwo.ca; Tue, 27 Feb 2007 19:50:20 -0700 Received: from steve by lnx3.holmesgrown.com with local (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1HMEos-00061O-NY for speakup@braille.uwo.ca; Tue, 27 Feb 2007 19:45:30 -0700 Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2007 19:45:30 -0700 From: Steve Holmes To: speakup@braille.uwo.ca Subject: Re: Espeak Problems Message-ID: <20070228024530.GA7295@lnx3.holmesgrown.com> Mail-Followup-To: speakup@braille.uwo.ca References: <1172604869.7608.3.camel@chopin> <1172608887.7608.19.camel@chopin> <20070227215743.GA7100@lnx3.holmesgrown.com> <1172616602.7608.58.camel@chopin> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1172616602.7608.58.camel@chopin> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.12-2006-07-14 X-BeenThere: speakup@braille.uwo.ca X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list Reply-To: "Speakup is a screen review system for Linux." List-Id: "Speakup is a screen review system for Linux." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2007 02:46:01 -0000 This is really strange. I know I have what I believe to be the latest version of speechd-up but --version says "0.1" but I just untarred version 0.4.tar.gz and compiled and ran it with ./speechd-up --version and it still says "0.1". In any case, I can use the punctuation controls from Speakup, being the speakup-f7 thru speakup-f10 keys and punctuation levels do change. I have no -t passed on the command line either. Makes me wonder about the version in the latest program. Well, I just looked at the detailed listing of the archive and speechd-up.c is dated Oct 21, 2006 and options.h is from slightly earlier in 2006 but the defined version number still says 0.1.:) No such luck on espeak-generic taking punct levels yet:); I haven't copied that conf file into my prod environment yet nor have I built it yet, but that's for another day.:) Anyway, I've always been able to use speakup's punctuation level changes and took for granted that always worked for all. But I'm using English language too. On Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 11:50:02PM +0100, Hynek Hanke wrote: > On Tue, 2007-02-27 at 14:57 -0700, Steve Holmes wrote: > > That's interesting about the -t option. I'm pretty sure I run > > speechd-up with no options and I can still control punctuation with > > Speakup's punct level controls. You got me wondering now.:) > > Either you are using an old version of speechd-up or you have already > succeeded in adding the missing functionality to Speech Dispatcher > generic output module ;) > > Without -t, speechd-up will rewrite the punctuation tables of Speakup. > Thus punctuation can be handled in the synthesizer itself and > internationalization and better intonation are possible. > > With Regards, > Hynek > > > _______________________________________________ > Speakup mailing list > Speakup@braille.uwo.ca > http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup -- HolmesGrown Solutions The best solutions for the best price! http://holmesgrown.ld.net/