From: "Raul A. Gallegos" <raul@asmodean.net>
To: speakup@braille.uwo.ca
Subject: why I didn't choose GRML
Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2006 12:29:29 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060628182929.GC2302@asmodean> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <003b01c69ace$462973a0$6505a8c0@ALBERTLC7SN0ZA>
* propaine <propaine@verizon.net> [060628 10:14]:
> Since I'm considering whether to upgrade Fedora or switch to something else,
> can you tell me why you decided that GRML is not for you? Thanks!
I'd be happy to. But first let me say that I like GRML linux very much
and am not interested in starting any sort of distro war here.
I don't just use Linux as an end user. I run my own mail server, web
server, ssh server, etc, you get the picture. Right now it seems that
because GRML is based on Debian unstable there are sometimes problems.
Packages are constantly updated which is the nature of the beast and
from time to time a package might break your system. Because I run a
production server I cannot run an unstable os. I've used Debian before
and liked it very much and even considerred going back to it. However
one of the main concerns here was time. I know how to install Fedora
very quickly and needed to get up and running as quick as possible. Here
is where GRML originally came into the picture. I love how you can
simply pop the cd in and have a running Linux system right away. On
three machies I tried it on both using software and hardware speakup
synthesizers they worked from the get go. So, it's not GRML's fault
really. It's just for my particular needs I need something which is not
unstable in the way of packages.
When I ran grml2hd it gave me fits and I had to manually tweak the
script to make it possible for me to install. I forget the line number
but it had to do with the code which checks the hard drive space
available. There was a /1024 line which was throwing it off. So, I took
that line out and hard coded in the space value so the script would
continue.
On top of that dovecot had to be tweaked quite a bit to get pop logins
working right and really, the list goes on.
This is not to say that GRML is bad and in fact I really love their mutt
configureation style. I've actually used some of those settings for my
muttrc now. I also like the fact that it boots so quickly although I
realize that GRML is not the only one so take that for what it's worth.
Hope this helps.
--
Raul A. Gallegos ... IliwSsmc
next prev parent reply other threads:[~ UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
installed Fedora Core 5 but have questions Raul A. Gallegos
` Willem van der Walt
` Raul A. Gallegos
` Dawes, Stephen
` Raul A. Gallegos
` propaine
` Raul A. Gallegos [this message]
` why I didn't choose GRML propaine
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060628182929.GC2302@asmodean \
--to=raul@asmodean.net \
--cc=speakup@braille.uwo.ca \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).