From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pop-canoe.atl.sa.earthlink.net ([207.69.195.66]) by speech.braille.uwo.ca with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1EhInz-0001hx-00 for ; Tue, 29 Nov 2005 22:38:51 -0500 Received: from 216-203-252-241.phx-01.cvx.algx.net ([216.203.252.241] helo=bookpc.romuald.net.eu.org) by pop-canoe.atl.sa.earthlink.net with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #10) id 1EhInx-0001xh-00 for speakup@braille.uwo.ca; Tue, 29 Nov 2005 22:38:50 -0500 Received: (qmail 4127 invoked by uid 1000); 30 Nov 2005 03:37:15 -0000 Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2005 20:37:15 -0700 From: Gregory Nowak To: "Speakup is a screen review system for Linux." Message-ID: <20051130033715.GA4036@bookpc.earthlink.net> References: <20051129031149.GI23546@rednote.net> <000201c5f49b$3b0d1af0$6901a8c0@QUARK> <20051129132437.GJ23546@rednote.net> <20051129173949.GA3085@bookpc.earthlink.net> <20051130015508.GD5268@rednote.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20051130015508.GD5268@rednote.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-PGP-Key: http://www.romuald.net.eu.org/pubkey.asc Subject: Re: Routing Multiple Inbound IP Addresses -- How? X-BeenThere: speakup@braille.uwo.ca X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: "Speakup is a screen review system for Linux." List-Id: "Speakup is a screen review system for Linux." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2005 03:38:51 -0000 On Tue, Nov 29, 2005 at 08:55:08PM -0500, Janina Sajka wrote: > OK. So, I tried this, with my correct addresses, of course. It didn't > work. > Did you get any errors from iptables? If not, then have you looked at the output of iptables -t nat -n -L to get an idea of how iptables interprets your current rule sets in the nat table? Iptables does what it does very well once you've got it set up, but getting things set up properly and debugged is no walk in the park. > In the iptables rules I note that there are rules to accept responses > for anything that originated on the inside. Do I maybe need similar > rules for packets that originated on the outside via these addresses? In > order that the response can be forwarded back out over the Internet? > Hmmm, you might. I'm not sure though if the definitive response here is yes, or no. I'll need to consider it, or maybe someone will beat me to it with a definite answer to that question. Greg -- Free domains: http://www.eu.org/ or mail dns-manager@EU.org