From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from user-0c99bpv.cable.mindspring.com ([24.148.175.63] helo=taylor.homelinux.net) by speech.braille.uwo.ca with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1E5ZOH-0002cz-00 for ; Wed, 17 Aug 2005 21:40:21 -0400 Received: from lorenzo by taylor.homelinux.net with local (Exim 4.52) id 1E5ZPC-0000AG-5S for speakup@braille.uwo.ca; Wed, 17 Aug 2005 21:41:20 -0400 Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2005 21:41:18 -0400 To: speakup@braille.uwo.ca Message-ID: <20050818014118.GA27220@taylor.homelinux.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.10i From: Lorenzo Taylor X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: lorenzo@taylor.homelinux.net X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.4 (2005-06-05) on taylor.homelinux.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL autolearn=ham version=3.0.4 X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2 (built Thu, 03 Mar 2005 10:44:12 +0100) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on taylor.homelinux.net) Subject: Speakup & 2.6.12 kernels X-BeenThere: speakup@braille.uwo.ca X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: "Speakup is a screen review system for Linux." List-Id: "Speakup is a screen review system for Linux." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2005 01:40:21 -0000 I am trying to patch a 2.6.12 kernel from Debian with Speakup 2.0, which says that it will work with any 2.6.10 or later kernel.. However, I am getting the following when I run ./install from the speakup directory: Patching version v26 Creating .orig files [...............] done. Patching files [ppppppp1 out of 3 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file drivers/Makefile.rej pppp9 out of 13 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file drivers/char/vt.c.rej pppp] done. Copying files [ccccc] done. I tried using Speakup from CVS with slightly different but very similar results. Is it safe to go ahead and try compiling the kernel? Does Speakup just not work with 2.6.12 kernels? Or is it a Debian thing since I am using the Debian kernel sources? All help appreciated, Lorenzo -- Living your life is a task so difficult, it has never been attempted before.