From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from fed1rmmtao04.cox.net ([68.230.241.35]) by speech.braille.uwo.ca with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1E0jit-0007fK-00 for ; Thu, 04 Aug 2005 13:41:39 -0400 Received: from lnx2.holmesgrown.com ([68.98.98.68]) by fed1rmmtao04.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.04.00 201-2131-118-20041027) with ESMTP id <20050804174106.DRIA15197.fed1rmmtao04.cox.net@lnx2.holmesgrown.com> for ; Thu, 4 Aug 2005 13:41:06 -0400 Received: from lnx3.holmesgrown.com ([192.168.1.5] ident=mail) by lnx2.holmesgrown.com with esmtp (Exim 4.10) id 1E0jiM-0001Ir-00 for speakup@braille.uwo.ca; Thu, 04 Aug 2005 10:41:06 -0700 Received: from steve by lnx3.holmesgrown.com with local (Exim 4.20) id 1E0jiP-0007Pv-8K for speakup@braille.uwo.ca; Thu, 04 Aug 2005 10:41:09 -0700 Date: Thu, 4 Aug 2005 10:41:09 -0700 From: Steve Holmes To: speakup@braille.uwo.ca Message-ID: <20050804174107.GA28494@lnx3.holmesgrown.com> Mail-Followup-To: speakup@braille.uwo.ca References: <20050801041927.GA11158@cm.nu> <20050804172329.GA28402@lnx3.holmesgrown.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; x-action=pgp-signed Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050804172329.GA28402@lnx3.holmesgrown.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i Sender: "Steve Holmes,,," Subject: Re: CVS Updates - was default speakup for Debian Sarge X-BeenThere: speakup@braille.uwo.ca X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: "Speakup is a screen review system for Linux." List-Id: "Speakup is a screen review system for Linux." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Aug 2005 17:41:39 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: RIPEMD160 Also, What versions of 2.4 kernels will this latest CVS Speakup work on? I have an old laptop here that I am sticking to 2.4 for the forseable future. Thanks for any help. I could use Speakup 2.0 tar ball if needs be. thanks. On Thu, Aug 04, 2005 at 10:23:31AM -0700, Steve Holmes wrote: > Speaking of updates to cVS, I'm no longer getting any update > announcements when changes are posted to CVS. Is that list broken > again? This Speakup/kernel version compatibility stuff is going to have > to be documented carefully and clearly. the tar ball came out not more > than 3 months or so ago and now it is no longer compatible with the > latest kernel if I understand things correctly. How easy would it be to > recreate the tar ball with the latest version to try and keep > reasonablly current with a current production kernel? I have on some > occasions, patched a "working version of Speakup inside a given kernel > source and tar that back up for personal recovery purposes but I'm > trying to think of someone new to Speakup who wants to get started and > would hope he wouldn't have to do CVS and hopt to God it matches the > kernel he is using. > > I would really like to know the procedure of how to take a CVS snap shot > of Speakup and convert it into a tarball that will still compile and > work. > > On Thu, Aug 04, 2005 at 11:00:36AM -0500, Gene Collins wrote: > > Hi Shane. The latest cvs has been modified to work with 2.6.12, and > > will no longer work with 2.6.11 and earlier. I suggest you grab the > > Speakup 2.0 tar ball and shoehorn that into the 2.6.8 kernel. > > > > Gene > > -- > HolmesGrown Solutions > The best solutions for the best price! > http://ld.net/?holmesgrown > > _______________________________________________ > Speakup mailing list > Speakup@braille.uwo.ca > http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup > > - -- HolmesGrown Solutions The best solutions for the best price! http://ld.net/?holmesgrown -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFC8lMzWSjv55S0LfERA1G+AJ0VGXuKKFo/sAsgiGim6nnFXLcqcQCeKfd9 S6AfgAqPwyg0uj+2QGxX/+U= =Uy6w -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----