From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from fed1rmmtao10.cox.net ([68.230.241.29]) by speech.braille.uwo.ca with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1DNWzw-0008JB-00 for ; Mon, 18 Apr 2005 10:13:12 -0400 Received: from lnx2.holmesgrown.com ([68.98.98.68]) by fed1rmmtao10.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.04.00 201-2131-118-20041027) with ESMTP id <20050418141239.CVDL2123.fed1rmmtao10.cox.net@lnx2.holmesgrown.com> for ; Mon, 18 Apr 2005 10:12:39 -0400 Received: from lnx3.holmesgrown.com ([192.168.1.5] ident=mail) by lnx2.holmesgrown.com with esmtp (Exim 4.10) id 1DNWzM-0005LC-00 for speakup@braille.uwo.ca; Mon, 18 Apr 2005 07:12:36 -0700 Received: from steve by lnx3.holmesgrown.com with local (Exim 4.20) id 1DNWzO-0001Fo-7e for speakup@braille.uwo.ca; Mon, 18 Apr 2005 07:12:38 -0700 Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2005 07:12:38 -0700 From: Steve Holmes To: "Speakup is a screen review system for Linux." Message-ID: <20050418141236.GB4681@lnx3.holmesgrown.com> Mail-Followup-To: "Speakup is a screen review system for Linux." References: <20050417030657.GA13299@blackbox> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; x-action=pgp-signed Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i Sender: "Steve Holmes,,," Subject: Re: Testing #3 -- please ignore X-BeenThere: speakup@braille.uwo.ca X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: "Speakup is a screen review system for Linux." List-Id: "Speakup is a screen review system for Linux." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2005 14:13:13 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: RIPEMD160 On Sun, Apr 17, 2005 at 05:04:05AM -0400, Charles Hallenbeck wrote: > Test #3 was my first successful test. The other two were not sent > immediately due to my configuration errors, and unfortunately they got > sent after I got my act together. > > I cannot send mail to my own address since it gets delivered locally > instead of going out through my ISP and finding its way back. I either > need to use a public mailing list or have a friend cooperate to send me > mail. I guess if I had a cooperative friend I wouldn't have to use the > list. It was just easier. What I do in situations like this is use a second mail account out on one of these services like haotmail or yahoo or something. It so happens I have a yahoo mail account I use for junk and spam and I just use that for my mail config testing. Another way to do a sneaky test using a public list is to respond to somebody's e-mail with a quick comment that isn't really important. That way, if the test gets through, so good and you will see the results. if test fails, well the reply wasn't super important anyhow. Just a couple ways to test without sending test messages to the list. - -- HolmesGrown Solutions The best solutions for the best price! http://ld.net/?holmesgrown -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFCY8BUWSjv55S0LfERA6DVAKDaa9/xsHKSKgT3+PY+Kak0KCx9OQCeKy+e 2M5pSxnW97F9OM2sfcqaugY= =lNjv -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----