From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from ms-smtp-04-smtplb.tampabay.rr.com ([65.32.5.134] helo=ms-smtp-04.tampabay.rr.com) by speech.braille.uwo.ca with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1DKxKA-0001aJ-00 for ; Mon, 11 Apr 2005 07:43:26 -0400 Received: from manta.diver.dwn (653245hfc121.tampabay.res.rr.com [65.32.45.121]) by ms-smtp-04.tampabay.rr.com (8.12.10/8.12.7) with ESMTP id j3BBhDpp012508 for ; Mon, 11 Apr 2005 07:43:13 -0400 (EDT) Received: from keith by manta.diver.dwn with local (Exim 4.50) id 1DKxKs-0003qS-4F for speakup@braille.uwo.ca; Mon, 11 Apr 2005 07:44:10 -0400 Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2005 07:44:09 -0400 From: Keith Watson To: "Speakup is a screen review system for Linux." Message-ID: <20050411114409.GA14378@smed.yi.org> References: <42587663.5030705@freedombox.cc> <20050410043628.GA13727@blackbox> <20050410152119.GA18794@smed.yi.org> <4259DF1A.8000200@freedombox.cc> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4259DF1A.8000200@freedombox.cc> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine Subject: Re: FreedomBox X-BeenThere: speakup@braille.uwo.ca X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Kwatson@smed.yi.org, "Speakup is a screen review system for Linux." List-Id: "Speakup is a screen review system for Linux." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2005 11:43:26 -0000 Matt, Ah the great pissing contest begins...and ends because this is the last I will say on this matter. You contradict yourself my friend. First you say he has root access to the systems and then you say that he has no access to them. Which is it? Can't have the cake and not eat it. As for the junkie analogy, it was only that, an analogy. I could have said that it would be like putting someone with a gambling addiction in the middle of Vegas with a bank roll and telling them not to gamble. I could have said that it was like giving candy to a baby and expecting the child not to partake. The point is that past experience from his actions, supported by others on the list and not just myself, point to the fact that it will in all likely hood happen again. He pays your bills, and you feel the need to defend his actions, actions that regardless of how much of a philanthropist you claim that he is, have been shown to be otherwise. Let's just agree to disagree and call it a day. Keith