From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from concerto.rednote.net ([66.92.170.139]) by speech.braille.uwo.ca with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1DIpi6-0006o8-00 for ; Tue, 05 Apr 2005 11:11:22 -0400 Received: from concerto.rednote.net (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by concerto.rednote.net (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j35FBK8F021380 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 11:11:20 -0400 Received: (from janina@localhost) by concerto.rednote.net (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id j35FBKTt021379 for speakup@braille.uwo.ca; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 11:11:20 -0400 Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2005 11:11:20 -0400 From: Janina Sajka To: "Speakup is a screen review system for Linux." Message-ID: <20050405151120.GH11527@rednote.net> Mail-Followup-To: "Speakup is a screen review system for Linux." References: <20050404183758.GA11527@rednote.net> <000e01c5394a$622badc0$220110ac@jim> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <000e01c5394a$622badc0$220110ac@jim> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-Operating-System: Linux concerto.rednote.net 2.6.10-1.770_FC3spksmp Organization: Capital Accessibility LLC (http://www.CapitalAccessibility.com) X-PGP-Key: http://www.CapitalAccessibility.com/JaninaSajka_gpg_key.html Subject: Re: getting off my windows dependency X-BeenThere: speakup@braille.uwo.ca X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: "Speakup is a screen review system for Linux." List-Id: "Speakup is a screen review system for Linux." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2005 15:11:22 -0000 jim grimsby writes: > > > OK. This makes some sense, but I suspect we agree it can be a nuisance > for adapted browsing. > Why it is just like a tab control basically it allows you to move back > and forth between to web pages. For example lets say you have a mutt > document on the one had and your isp settings on the other hand. It's a nuisance if an application decides, on its own logic, to force you into multiple screens/instances. It's a feature if the user wants and asks for it. That's the difference. It's a question of who is in control. PS: Mutt configurations are not written in html, so are not "web documents." Neither, for that matter, are any network settings configuration files relating to any ISP I know. While these might, or might not, be managed via an html front end, they are blessedly simple ASCII files which can be edited any way you choose. That's the point. Freedom to choose.