From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from fed1rmmtao12.cox.net ([68.230.241.27]) by speech.braille.uwo.ca with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1DIY83-0004fx-00 for ; Mon, 04 Apr 2005 16:24:59 -0400 Received: from lnx2.holmesgrown.com ([68.98.98.68]) by fed1rmmtao12.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.04.00 201-2131-118-20041027) with ESMTP id <20050404202422.QYA13819.fed1rmmtao12.cox.net@lnx2.holmesgrown.com> for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 16:24:22 -0400 Received: from lnx3.holmesgrown.com ([192.168.1.5] ident=mail) by lnx2.holmesgrown.com with esmtp (Exim 4.10) id 1DIY7Q-0004Up-00 for speakup@braille.uwo.ca; Mon, 04 Apr 2005 13:24:20 -0700 Received: from steve by lnx3.holmesgrown.com with local (Exim 4.20) id 1DIY7U-0000cW-Km for speakup@braille.uwo.ca; Mon, 04 Apr 2005 13:24:24 -0700 Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2005 13:24:24 -0700 From: Steve Holmes To: speakup@braille.uwo.ca Message-ID: <20050404202423.GC2190@lnx3.holmesgrown.com> Mail-Followup-To: speakup@braille.uwo.ca References: <20050403201401.GA9059@romuald.net.eu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; x-action=pgp-signed Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050403201401.GA9059@romuald.net.eu.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i Sender: "Steve Holmes,,," Subject: Re: upgrading slackware with swaret X-BeenThere: speakup@braille.uwo.ca X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: "Speakup is a screen review system for Linux." List-Id: "Speakup is a screen review system for Linux." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2005 20:24:59 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: RIPEMD160 It was dropped even with 10.0. I was really sorry to see it go as there really isn't anything else in its place. I didn't get to do a whole lot with it when I did use it but it looked interesting and I thought promising. On Sun, Apr 03, 2005 at 03:14:01PM -0500, Gregory Nowak wrote: > Hi all slackers and everyone else. > > I've got a box running slackware 9.1 here, that I didn't have time to > upgrade before, but have gotten around to wanting to upgrade it to > slack 10.1 now. I am trying to do this with swaret 1.3.1, which came > as an extra package in slack 9.1. My swaret.conf file is fine, since I > used it last time to upgrade to slackware 9.1. So, I just changed the > slackware version number in there from 9.1, to 10.1, and mounted the > first slackware cd under /cdrom, where swaret expects to find all the > packages, as I've configured it to do. > > I run > > swaret --update > > , and it compiles all the checksums, file lists, ETC, ETC, ETC, and > everything runs just fine. Then, I do > > swaret --up-all -A > > , and swaret tells me that all my installed packages are up to date, > which is obviously not the case. So, does anyone know what gives? > Should I first perhaps upgrade swaret using the standard slackware > upgradepkg tool, or is swaret simply not used to upgrade anymore? Any > informative input would be appreciated. Thanks in advance. > > Greg > > > -- > web site: http://www.romuald.net.eu.org > gpg public key: http://www.romuald.net.eu.org/pubkey.asc > skype: gregn1 > (authorization required, add me to your contacts list first) > > -- > Free domains: http://www.eu.org/ or mail dns-manager@EU.org > > _______________________________________________ > Speakup mailing list > Speakup@braille.uwo.ca > http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup > > - -- HolmesGrown Solutions The best solutions for the best price! http://ld.net/?holmesgrown -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFCUaJ3WSjv55S0LfERA8+oAJ4trISYL4cknHZ9PQLZdd+PFdXcrwCfXpZE wgQzDE+L/d6C3JeJAvLpVAo= =YVwH -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----