From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from fed1rmmtao09.cox.net ([68.230.241.30]) by speech.braille.uwo.ca with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1DIY4K-0004SH-00 for ; Mon, 04 Apr 2005 16:21:08 -0400 Received: from lnx2.holmesgrown.com ([68.98.98.68]) by fed1rmmtao09.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.04.00 201-2131-118-20041027) with ESMTP id <20050404202033.YAPQ19936.fed1rmmtao09.cox.net@lnx2.holmesgrown.com> for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 16:20:33 -0400 Received: from lnx3.holmesgrown.com ([192.168.1.5] ident=mail) by lnx2.holmesgrown.com with esmtp (Exim 4.10) id 1DIY3i-0004Uh-00 for speakup@braille.uwo.ca; Mon, 04 Apr 2005 13:20:30 -0700 Received: from steve by lnx3.holmesgrown.com with local (Exim 4.20) id 1DIY3m-0000bq-0d for speakup@braille.uwo.ca; Mon, 04 Apr 2005 13:20:34 -0700 Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2005 13:20:34 -0700 From: Steve Holmes To: "Speakup is a screen review system for Linux." Message-ID: <20050404202032.GB2190@lnx3.holmesgrown.com> Mail-Followup-To: "Speakup is a screen review system for Linux." References: <20050402131516.GA9263@blackbox> <20050402142405.GA11245@blackbox> <20050402181444.GA19100@blackbox> <20050403032738.GB9423@lnx3.holmesgrown.com> <20050403045010.GA8654@blackbox> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; x-action=pgp-signed Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050403045010.GA8654@blackbox> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i Sender: "Steve Holmes,,," Subject: Re: links 2.1 and elinks was Re: Slackware is dropping Gnome X-BeenThere: speakup@braille.uwo.ca X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: "Speakup is a screen review system for Linux." List-Id: "Speakup is a screen review system for Linux." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2005 20:21:08 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: RIPEMD160 On Sat, Apr 02, 2005 at 10:50:10PM -0600, Kenny Hitt wrote: > > What version of linkx 2.1 are you using? It's up to pre 17 now. I'm still on pre15; didn't realize newer versions came out that recently. Has there been improvements to javascript support in these later versions? > Elinks is a C program and doesn't use any java. It does use > spidermonkey which is Mozilla's javascript inturpreter, but that's a C > program. I personally don't know of any console browser that needs > Java. I may have confused things a bit. Yes, it was spidermonkey I was thinking of. I recall reading the various requirements to get elinks going and at the time, it seemed overwelming to me. Maybe it isn't all that bad but for some reason, I thought I heard that spidermonkey had some strange quirks. Is elinks that good a deal? - -- HolmesGrown Solutions The best solutions for the best price! http://ld.net/?holmesgrown -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFCUaGQWSjv55S0LfERA9uPAKCDd8BUtoSpCANnxHt9jFy76vOw0wCgnLoh fa7tnuIs/MZ9+MjRm6C/TdE= =m7P3 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----