From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from concerto.rednote.net ([66.92.170.139])
	by speech.braille.uwo.ca with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
	id 1DHkVF-0007yW-00
	for <speakup@braille.uwo.ca>; Sat, 02 Apr 2005 10:25:38 -0500
Received: from concerto.rednote.net (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
	by concerto.rednote.net (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j32FPb21026617
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO)
	for <speakup@braille.uwo.ca>; Sat, 2 Apr 2005 10:25:37 -0500
Received: (from janina@localhost)
	by concerto.rednote.net (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id j32FPagX026616
	for speakup@braille.uwo.ca; Sat, 2 Apr 2005 10:25:37 -0500
Date: Sat, 2 Apr 2005 10:25:36 -0500
From: Janina Sajka <janina@rednote.net>
To: speakup@braille.uwo.ca
Message-ID: <20050402152536.GT11527@rednote.net>
Mail-Followup-To: speakup@braille.uwo.ca
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i
X-Operating-System: Linux concerto.rednote.net 2.6.10-1.770_FC3spksmp
Organization: Capital Accessibility LLC (http://www.CapitalAccessibility.com)
X-PGP-Key: http://www.CapitalAccessibility.com/JaninaSajka_gpg_key.html
Subject: Feature Request
X-BeenThere: speakup@braille.uwo.ca
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
Reply-To: "Speakup is a screen review system for Linux."
	<speakup@braille.uwo.ca>
List-Id: "Speakup is a screen review system for Linux."
	<speakup.braille.uwo.ca>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup>,
	<mailto:speakup-request@braille.uwo.ca?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://braille.uwo.ca/pipermail/speakup>
List-Post: <mailto:speakup@braille.uwo.ca>
List-Help: <mailto:speakup-request@braille.uwo.ca?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup>,
	<mailto:speakup-request@braille.uwo.ca?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Apr 2005 15:25:38 -0000

I'm finding I would appreciate a slightly different behavior from the
"read current word" key in Speakup.

In the instance when current word is a single char, I would like it to
acknowledge upper and lower case differences. In other words, I think 5
should behave exactly as 2 does, when the current-word is actually a
single-char in upper case.

Thoughts?


-- 

Janina Sajka				Phone: +1.202.494.7040
Partner, Capital Accessibility LLC	http://www.CapitalAccessibility.Com

Chair, Accessibility Workgroup		Free Standards Group (FSG)
janina@freestandards.org		http://a11y.org

If Linux can't solve your computing problem, you need a different problem.