From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from fed1rmmtao04.cox.net ([68.230.241.35]) by speech.braille.uwo.ca with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1CD3vg-0007rg-00 for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 12:37:16 -0400 Received: from lnx2.holmesgrown.com ([68.98.98.68]) by fed1rmmtao04.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.03.04 201-2131-111-106-20040729) with ESMTP id <20040930163635.OSEZ1082.fed1rmmtao04.cox.net@lnx2.holmesgrown.com> for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 12:36:35 -0400 Received: from lnx3.holmesgrown.com ([192.168.1.5] ident=mail) by lnx2.holmesgrown.com with esmtp (Exim 4.10) id 1CD3ux-0004Vj-00 for speakup@braille.uwo.ca; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 09:36:31 -0700 Received: from steve by lnx3.holmesgrown.com with local (Exim 4.20) id 1CD3v0-00013F-Nj for speakup@braille.uwo.ca; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 09:36:34 -0700 Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 09:36:34 -0700 From: Steve Holmes To: speakup@braille.uwo.ca Message-ID: <20040930163627.GB3126@lnx3.holmesgrown.com> Mail-Followup-To: speakup@braille.uwo.ca References: <20040929175604.GS7958@rednote.net> <20040929204131.GA14532@rogers.com> <20040929210228.GJ3843@tomass.dyndns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; x-action=pgp-signed Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040929210228.GJ3843@tomass.dyndns.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i Sender: "Steve Holmes,,," Subject: Re: Laptop keymap... was: battery on notebook X-BeenThere: speakup@braille.uwo.ca X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: "Speakup is a screen review system for Linux." List-Id: "Speakup is a screen review system for Linux." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 16:37:16 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hey, I just noticed something very strange here. I just looked around and I don't have a genmap anymore. Upon further investigation, it appears that it only gets built if the kernel version is 2.4. I say this after looking at the Makefile. ifeq ($V,2.4) ... all make targets for genmap and the keymap.h ... endif Any reason for that? Is there an alternative for 2.6 or should this conditional come out? I just checked out a new speakup and see this right now. - -- HolmesGrown Solutions The best solutions for the best price! http://ld.net/?holmesgrown -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFBXDYLWSjv55S0LfERApk0AJ4vo/DC7Z6cmauosnXxfNu8IqVPaQCg+J+x sJT6AGx4pMIB6Yvur5uOJLg= =57/O -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----