From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from dsl092-170-084.wdc2.dsl.speakeasy.net ([66.92.170.84] helo=concerto.rednote.net) by speech.braille.uwo.ca with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1CCI1j-0001y3-00 for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 09:28:19 -0400 Received: from concerto.rednote.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by concerto.rednote.net (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i8SDRMad023931 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 09:27:22 -0400 Received: (from janina@localhost) by concerto.rednote.net (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id i8SDRMQm023930 for speakup@braille.uwo.ca; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 09:27:22 -0400 Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 09:27:22 -0400 From: Janina Sajka To: "Speakup is a screen review system for Linux." Message-ID: <20040928132722.GC7958@rednote.net> References: <20040927020623.GB1234@rogers.com> <20040927030925.GA1393@rogers.com> <20040928123131.GF7962@rednote.net> <20040928130646.GA7958@rednote.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-Operating-System: Linux concerto.rednote.net 2.6.8-1.541.root Organization: Capital Accessibility LLC (http://www.CapitalAccessibility.com) X-PGP-Key: http://www.CapitalAccessibility.com/JaninaSajka_gpg_key.html Subject: Re: Linux system...dressed downfrom yesterday. X-BeenThere: speakup@braille.uwo.ca X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: "Speakup is a screen review system for Linux." List-Id: "Speakup is a screen review system for Linux." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 13:28:19 -0000 In this context, 'kill' is a term of art. It refers to the technology which automatically deletes email that matches certain criteria. It's typically available via several mail handling utilities, including mail clients. It may be an unfortunate term, but that's another issue that you can take up or ignore. Karen Lewellen writes: > You are saying that indeed you will intentionally and deliberately > disregard the stated requests of any other lister. Thanks again for > illustrating my point. Not what I said at all, just how you chose to read me.