From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from dsl092-170-084.wdc2.dsl.speakeasy.net ([66.92.170.84] helo=concerto.rednote.net) by speech.braille.uwo.ca with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1CC2eL-00084O-00 for ; Mon, 27 Sep 2004 17:03:09 -0400 Received: from concerto.rednote.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by concerto.rednote.net (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i8RL2IBO019700 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 27 Sep 2004 17:02:19 -0400 Received: (from janina@localhost) by concerto.rednote.net (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id i8RL2IZq019699 for speakup@braille.uwo.ca; Mon, 27 Sep 2004 17:02:18 -0400 Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2004 17:02:18 -0400 From: Janina Sajka To: "Speakup is a screen review system for Linux." Message-ID: <20040927210218.GE7962@rednote.net> References: <20040920191737.GA6381@lnx3.holmesgrown.com> <20040927181323.GJ7958@rednote.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Subject: Re: Linux and data storage? X-BeenThere: speakup@braille.uwo.ca X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: "Speakup is a screen review system for Linux." List-Id: "Speakup is a screen review system for Linux." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2004 21:03:09 -0000 Yes, Luke was just point out that -m is not available on BSD. But, you probably do have: du --help You should check from your prompt on shell world, but I suspect you can just do: du -s and get a result in kilobytes. The -m just gives the result in megabytes.. But, having also myself just looked at du --help, I can now ammend something else I just said a minute ago. Instead of subtracting a total for mail, do: du -s -x mail/ to exclude the mail directory from the calculations. So, get anything better with these commands? Karen Lewellen writes: > Janina, > We shall not see quite yet grin. It seems that there is no -m option in > our edition of the "du" program. > I ran it in this way: > du -ms > I was told that following: > illegal usage du -m > with a list of other command line options. > I have asked our system administrator how the program works for us. > Karen