From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from ms-smtp-03-lbl.southeast.rr.com ([24.25.9.102] helo=ms-smtp-03-eri0.southeast.rr.com) by speech.braille.uwo.ca with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1C19r7-0001ua-00 for ; Sat, 28 Aug 2004 16:31:21 -0400 Received: from quantum (rdu74-168-227.nc.rr.com [24.74.168.227]) by ms-smtp-03-eri0.southeast.rr.com (8.12.10/8.12.7) with ESMTP id i7SKV9iB005463 for ; Sat, 28 Aug 2004 16:31:18 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <200408282031.i7SKV9iB005463@ms-smtp-03-eri0.southeast.rr.com> From: "Sina Bahram" To: "'Speakup is a screen review system for Linux.'" Date: Sat, 28 Aug 2004 16:31:17 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.6353 In-reply-to: <20040828141840.GA25600@gmx.net> X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 Thread-index: AcSND+/GNlCHvRudQFGU3lc1eusHRAALduRQ X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine Subject: RE: Gnoppernicus and remote? X-BeenThere: speakup@braille.uwo.ca X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.4 Precedence: list Reply-To: "Speakup is a screen review system for Linux." List-Id: "Speakup is a screen review system for Linux." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 28 Aug 2004 20:31:21 -0000 Yeh, but I want to get it working for sending from a t3 backend to a dialup....see the problems? For me, sure I'm not anticipating any problems...but for the people I want to set it up for...there might be some. Any suggestions guys? Take care, Sina No trees were destroyed in sending this message; however, a large number of electrons were terribly inconvenienced. -----Original Message----- From: speakup-bounces@braille.uwo.ca [mailto:speakup-bounces@braille.uwo.ca] On Behalf Of Alex Snow Sent: Saturday, August 28, 2004 10:19 AM To: Speakup is a screen review system for Linux. Subject: Re: Gnoppernicus and remote? -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 I think it only sends what sound it needs to play. and seeing how small the sounds are, and if you're on a 100mbps network, you shouldn't see a lag. On Sat, Aug 28, 2004 at 01:55:59AM -0400, Sina Bahram wrote: > > Thus sending the sound? or only sending what sound to be played? > > Take care, > Sina > > No trees were destroyed in sending this message; however, a large > number of electrons were terribly inconvenienced. > -----Original Message----- > From: speakup-bounces@braille.uwo.ca > [mailto:speakup-bounces@braille.uwo.ca] > On Behalf Of Alex Snow > Sent: Friday, August 27, 2004 10:51 PM > To: Speakup is a screen review system for Linux. > Subject: Re: Gnoppernicus and remote? > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > you wouldn't be piping the actual sound...you'd be using the x11 > protocol over the network. I think that's how it works... > On Fri, Aug 27, > 2004 at 05:55:23PM -0400, Sina Bahram wrote: > > So I could pipe both the sound from and the x session itself, over SSH? > > > > Wouldn't there then be some lag in gnoppernicus's output? > > > > I believe what WinEyes, and soon to be Jaws, does is send the text > > to be spoken over the network, and then let the client speak > > it....this way we're just sending little packets of ascii, which can fly. > > > > If I have to pipe the actual sound from gnoppernicus, I'm thinking > > there will be some serious lag? > > > > Take care, > > Sina > > > > No trees were destroyed in sending this message; however, a large > > number of electrons were terribly inconvenienced.