From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mxsf19.cluster1.charter.net ([209.225.28.219]) by speech.braille.uwo.ca with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1C0tJv-0007GE-00 for ; Fri, 27 Aug 2004 22:51:59 -0400 Received: from mxip14.cluster1.charter.net (mxip14a.cluster1.charter.net [209.225.28.144]) by mxsf19.cluster1.charter.net (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i7S2pPDY029182 for ; Fri, 27 Aug 2004 22:51:25 -0400 Received: from pc-24-151-13-200.newt1.ct.charter.com (HELO h14me.homelinux.net) (24.151.13.200) by mxip14.cluster1.charter.net with ESMTP; 27 Aug 2004 22:51:26 -0400 X-Ironport-AV: i="3.84,116,1091419200"; d="scan'208"; a="246066770:sNHT56994524" Received: from h14me.homelinux.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by h14me.homelinux.net (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i7S2pOdn010857 for ; Fri, 27 Aug 2004 22:51:24 -0400 Received: (from alex_snow@localhost) by h14me.homelinux.net (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i7S2pORg010856 for speakup@braille.uwo.ca; Fri, 27 Aug 2004 22:51:24 -0400 Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2004 22:51:24 -0400 From: Alex Snow To: "Speakup is a screen review system for Linux." Message-ID: <20040828025124.GA10824@gmx.net> References: <20040827205012.GA10013@gmx.net> <200408272155.i7RLtFSH019508@ms-smtp-04-eri0.southeast.rr.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; x-action=pgp-signed; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200408272155.i7RLtFSH019508@ms-smtp-04-eri0.southeast.rr.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2i Subject: Re: Gnoppernicus and remote? X-BeenThere: speakup@braille.uwo.ca X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.4 Precedence: list Reply-To: "Speakup is a screen review system for Linux." List-Id: "Speakup is a screen review system for Linux." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 28 Aug 2004 02:51:59 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 you wouldn't be piping the actual sound...you'd be using the x11 protocol over the network. I think that's how it works... On Fri, Aug 27, 2004 at 05:55:23PM -0400, Sina Bahram wrote: > So I could pipe both the sound from and the x session itself, over SSH? > > Wouldn't there then be some lag in gnoppernicus's output? > > I believe what WinEyes, and soon to be Jaws, does is send the text to be > spoken over the network, and then let the client speak it....this way we're > just sending little packets of ascii, which can fly. > > If I have to pipe the actual sound from gnoppernicus, I'm thinking there > will be some serious lag? > > Take care, > Sina > > No trees were destroyed in sending this message; however, a large number of > electrons were terribly inconvenienced. > -----Original Message----- > From: speakup-bounces@braille.uwo.ca [mailto:speakup-bounces@braille.uwo.ca] > On Behalf Of Alex Snow > Sent: Friday, August 27, 2004 4:50 PM > To: Speakup is a screen review system for Linux. > Subject: Re: Gnoppernicus and remote? > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > I know you can run an x session remotely (that's been part of x for > years) but I'm not sure how gnopernicus would like that...I think it'd work. > I have no idea how you'd set that up though, however I saw something on > doing it over ssh at one time but I forget where. > On Fri, > Aug 27, 2004 at 02:59:16PM -0400, Sina Bahram wrote: > > Hi guys, > > > > I hope all are well today. > > > > Here's the question: I want to know if it's possible to set up a > > system such that I can remotely access the linux box, x11 and all, and > > run gnoppernicus in gnome? > > > > I basically want to do what is availible with WinEyes and winXP's > > remote desktop feature...but with linux and gnome with gnoppernicus. > > > > Take care, > > Sina > > > > No trees were destroyed in sending this message; however, a large > > number of electrons were terribly inconvenienced. > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Speakup mailing list > > Speakup@braille.uwo.ca > > http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup > > - -- > LILO, you've got me on my knees! > -- David Black, dblack@pilot.njin.net, with apologies to Derek and > the Dominos, and Werner Almsberger -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux) > > iD8DBQFBL56E9XVrM3ri110RAj8kAJ4hyWRgVLh0lXycJVAFxvdIevkeXQCeMM0P > FWuMVY8mnwjeAGLfCtxKpQo= > =w1zP > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > _______________________________________________ > Speakup mailing list > Speakup@braille.uwo.ca > http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup > > > > _______________________________________________ > Speakup mailing list > Speakup@braille.uwo.ca > http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup - -- ...very few phenomena can pull someone out of Deep Hack Mode, with two noted exceptions: being struck by lightning, or worse, your *computer* being struck by lightning. -- Matt Welsh -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFBL/Ms9XVrM3ri110RAvxRAJ9sbBVdxfsYL2g9KqBM8I4lio+YPwCdHry3 XbWctGJ5X1yijMAPekuOakE= =LWWx -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----