From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mallard.mail.pas.earthlink.net ([207.217.120.48])
	by speech.braille.uwo.ca with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
	id 1BmbJw-00070r-00
	for <speakup@braille.uwo.ca>; Mon, 19 Jul 2004 12:48:56 -0400
Received: from h-68-166-89-140.chcgilgm.covad.net ([68.166.89.140]
	helo=linserver.romuald.net.eu.org)
	by mallard.mail.pas.earthlink.net with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1)
	id 1BmbJv-0006Z6-00
	for speakup@braille.uwo.ca; Mon, 19 Jul 2004 09:48:55 -0700
Received: (qmail 2537 invoked by uid 1023); 19 Jul 2004 16:48:57 -0000
Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2004 11:48:57 -0500
From: Gregory Nowak <greg@romuald.net.eu.org>
To: sbahram@nc.rr.com,
	"Speakup is a screen review system for Linux." <speakup@braille.uwo.ca>
Message-ID: <20040719164857.GB2446@romuald.net.eu.org>
References: <000601c46da5$883c4860$cc00a8c0@nickysp4>
	<000501c46da9$b7d9a050$6801a8c0@Sina>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; x-action=pgp-signed; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <000501c46da9$b7d9a050$6801a8c0@Sina>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2i
X-PGP-Key: http://www.romuald.net.eu.org/pubkey.asc
Cc: 
Subject: Re: A good synth?
X-BeenThere: speakup@braille.uwo.ca
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.4
Precedence: list
Reply-To: "Speakup is a screen review system for Linux."
	<speakup@braille.uwo.ca>
List-Id: "Speakup is a screen review system for Linux."
	<speakup.braille.uwo.ca>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup>,
	<mailto:speakup-request@braille.uwo.ca?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://braille.uwo.ca/pipermail/speakup>
List-Post: <mailto:speakup@braille.uwo.ca>
List-Help: <mailto:speakup-request@braille.uwo.ca?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup>,
	<mailto:speakup-request@braille.uwo.ca?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2004 16:48:56 -0000

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

I have to agree with Nick here. I think the doubletalk is the best
synth I've heard to date. I even think it sounds better then the
dectalk, though that maybe because I've used a doubletalk for about 6
years now, compared to infrequently working with a dectalk, for an
hour or less at a time, and there weren't many of those times.

Greg


On Mon, Jul 19, 2004 at 12:01:57PM -0400, Sina Bahram wrote:
> Are you serious? Wow, I thought DoubleTalk had to be the worst one
> ever....that's sad that hardware synths are so bad....
> 
> Thanks for your reply
> 
> Take care,
> Sina
> 

- -- 
Free domains: http://www.eu.org/ or mail dns-manager@EU.org

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFA+/t57s9z/XlyUyARAnQzAKDE/VPd2lxj/ZoERzqljUyxV1yLRwCfUGLv
OR8tSoC+5NvB0JIr6FmMDyk=
=sN1O
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----