From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from cantata.rednote.net ([66.92.170.86]) by speech.braille.uwo.ca with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1BCgTj-0005To-00 for ; Sun, 11 Apr 2004 11:02:35 -0400 Received: from toccata.rednote.net (IDENT:aKaHGP5lsxeJaNQKNQg0HtGpUo6Xo0Sr@toccata.rednote.net [66.92.170.85]) by cantata.rednote.net (8.12.11/8.12.11/Debian-4) with ESMTP id i3BF2XJo010435 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Sun, 11 Apr 2004 11:02:34 -0400 Received: from toccata.rednote.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by toccata.rednote.net (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i3BF1siD023916 for ; Sun, 11 Apr 2004 11:01:54 -0400 Received: (from janina@localhost) by toccata.rednote.net (8.12.10/8.12.11/Submit) id i3BF1pHf023914 for speakup@braille.uwo.ca; Sun, 11 Apr 2004 11:01:51 -0400 Date: Sun, 11 Apr 2004 11:01:51 -0400 From: Janina Sajka To: "Speakup is a screen review system for Linux." Message-ID: <20040411150150.GB6648@rednote.net> References: <001e01c41ef8$6ca4aa30$6401a8c0@handsontech> <4078AC36.3080207@freedombox.cc> <4078D620.5000906@freedombox.cc> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4078D620.5000906@freedombox.cc> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Subject: Re: FreedomBox ot? X-BeenThere: speakup@braille.uwo.ca X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.4 Precedence: list Reply-To: "Speakup is a screen review system for Linux." List-Id: "Speakup is a screen review system for Linux." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Apr 2004 15:02:35 -0000 Not so fast, Matt. What are you doing? What's this about you posting helpful advice about a non Speakup related application on the Speakup list. I'm sorry, but I must call you to task. Have you changed your mind about your post the other day calling discussions of the Mozilla license and Freedom Box' obligations off topic? Are you now considering Freedom Box on topic for the Speakup list? Or do you just think the license discussion is off topic but technical, user support type discussion on topic. Which is it? I think we deserve to know since you're the one who raised the issue most recently. So, let's finish that conversation. Which is it, Matt? Matt Campbell writes: > Well, FreedomBox doesn't require ALSA. I've tested it with the emu10k1 > OSS driver that comes with kernel version 2.4.22; I haven't tried a 2.6 > kernel yet. And on my 266 MHz machine I used the cs4231 OSS driver that > comes with the kernel.