From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mxsf15.cluster1.charter.net ([209.225.28.215]) by speech.braille.uwo.ca with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1ArbNY-0008E0-00 for ; Fri, 13 Feb 2004 06:21:04 -0500 Received: from h14me.homelinux.net (pc-24-151-10-129.newt1.ct.charter.com [24.151.10.129]) by mxsf15.cluster1.charter.net (8.12.10/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i1DBJNPr042085 for ; Fri, 13 Feb 2004 06:19:23 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from alex_snow@h14me.homelinux.net) Received: from h14me.homelinux.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by h14me.homelinux.net (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i1DBJNKT015272 for ; Fri, 13 Feb 2004 06:19:23 -0500 Received: (from alex_snow@localhost) by h14me.homelinux.net (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i1DBJNgA015271 for speakup@braille.uwo.ca; Fri, 13 Feb 2004 06:19:23 -0500 Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2004 06:19:23 -0500 From: Alex Snow To: "Speakup is a screen review system for Linux." Message-ID: <20040213111923.GB15261@gmx.net> References: <6D3A09C6CAB0D311BA5000902760D022040F1F8F@chpt0000se01.cherrypoint.usmc.mil> <20040212174312.GO710@rednote.net> <20040212181251.GA5131@linux1> <20040212190051.GP710@rednote.net> <20040213031220.GA4479@hogwarts.optusnet.com.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040213031220.GA4479@hogwarts.optusnet.com.au> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Subject: Re: Is ICMP important? X-BeenThere: speakup@braille.uwo.ca X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.4 Precedence: list Reply-To: "Speakup is a screen review system for Linux." List-Id: "Speakup is a screen review system for Linux." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2004 11:21:04 -0000 if it's illegal over here people do it anyways and no one seems to care. anothger stupid thing that is illegal on this state is wardiailing. On Fri, Feb 13, 2004 at 02:12:20PM +1100, Shaun Oliver wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > actually, janina and all, > port scanning is ilegal in some countries without the express permission > of the admin or owner of the machine you are attempting to port scan. > over here e.g. it's not worth your job to port scan. > you're frowned upon and garunteed a hard time if you want to try to get > work anywhere else as an i,t professional. > just bear that in mind people when you attempt a port scan. > personally I think it's rediculous and it's quite good in debugging and > detecting security holes, but, that's ouw law makers for ya. > > - -- > Shaun Oliver > > > "I refuse to have a battle of wits with an unarmed person." > email: shaun_oliver@optusnet.com.au > WEB: http://blindman.homelinux.org/ > IRC: irc.awesomechat.net:6666 > IRCNICK: blindman > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) > Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org > > iD8DBQFALECU67hYtcFGIIcRAm6fAJ4gqeDO/fQ90Sxa5bFceT6kA/pUYwCgkQnk > WFvrvgN/RpcQoe6zLiO3L/o= > =bju+ > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > -- > This message has been scanned for viruses and > dangerous content by MailScanner, and is > believed to be clean. > MailScanner thanks transtec Computers for their support. > > > _______________________________________________ > Speakup mailing list > Speakup@braille.uwo.ca > http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup -- Always borrow money from a pessimist; he doesn't expect to be paid back.