From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from user-69-1-42-5.knology.net ([69.1.42.5] helo=localhost)
	by speech.braille.uwo.ca with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
	id 1AKgeA-0001sT-00
	for <speakup@braille.uwo.ca>; Fri, 14 Nov 2003 11:18:10 -0500
Received: from kenny by localhost with local (Exim 4.24) id 1AKge9-0002wJ-A7
	for speakup@braille.uwo.ca; Fri, 14 Nov 2003 10:18:09 -0600
Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2003 10:18:09 -0600
To: "Speakup is a screen review system for Linux." <speakup@braille.uwo.ca>
Message-ID: <20031114161809.GC6934@blackbox.hittsjunk.net>
Mail-Followup-To: "Speakup is a screen review system for Linux."
	<speakup@braille.uwo.ca>
References: <20031113225839.GA9654@romuald.net.eu.org>
	<Pine.BSF.4.58.0311140712150.77890@server2.shellworld.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.58.0311140712150.77890@server2.shellworld.net>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i
From: Kenny Hitt <kenny@hittsjunk.net>
Subject: Re: 2.4.22
X-BeenThere: speakup@braille.uwo.ca
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.3
Precedence: list
Reply-To: "Speakup is a screen review system for Linux."
	<speakup@braille.uwo.ca>
List-Id: Speakup is a screen review system for Linux.
	<speakup.braille.uwo.ca>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup>,
	<mailto:speakup-request@braille.uwo.ca?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://braille.uwo.ca/pipermail/speakup>
List-Post: <mailto:speakup@braille.uwo.ca>
List-Help: <mailto:speakup-request@braille.uwo.ca?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup>,
	<mailto:speakup-request@braille.uwo.ca?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2003 16:18:10 -0000

I've been using it here with no problems.
2GHZ AMD with 512 meg ram 40 gig hd.

          Kenny
	  
On Fri, Nov 14, 2003 at 07:13:26AM +0000, Luke Davis wrote:
> Does anyone else hold this opinion (that 2.4.22 is crap)?  I am in the
> processof compiling it on a live commercial server, and would like
> opinions of this.
> 
> Luke
>  On Thu, 13 Nov 2003, Gregory Nowak wrote:
> 
> > Hi all.
> >
> > The subject says it all. I went back to linux 2.4.21, and the box
> > works like a charm. No segmentation faults, no inactivity for long
> > periods, it's all gone.
> >
> > Thanks to all who provided suggestions/help, but in the end it turned
> > out that 2.4.22 is a piece of crap.
> > That's my personal opinion, which I have the right to state, so no
> > flames please.
> >
> > Greg
> >
> >
> >
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Speakup mailing list
> Speakup@braille.uwo.ca
> http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup