From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from user-24-214-63-13.knology.net ([24.214.63.13] helo=smtp3.knology.net ident=qmailr) by speech.braille.uwo.ca with smtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 18pLn4-0002mv-00 for ; Sun, 02 Mar 2003 00:13:34 -0500 Received: (qmail 14503 invoked from network); 2 Mar 2003 05:13:25 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO potpal) (69.1.42.5) by smtp3.knology.net with SMTP; 2 Mar 2003 05:13:25 -0000 Received: from kennyhitt by potpal with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 18pLnK-0004y0-00 for ; Sat, 01 Mar 2003 23:13:50 -0600 Date: Sat, 1 Mar 2003 23:13:50 -0600 To: speakup@braille.uwo.ca Subject: Re: Configuration Files Message-ID: <20030302051350.GC16654@potpal> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i From: Kenny Hitt Sender: speakup-admin@braille.uwo.ca Errors-To: speakup-admin@braille.uwo.ca X-BeenThere: speakup@braille.uwo.ca X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: speakup@braille.uwo.ca List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Speakup is a screen review system for Linux. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Hi. I just created a set of one line scripts to change values of speakup. This way I can just type things like rate 7 to set the rate to 7. I just call these scripts during log in to set default values. If I want to change a value, I just get to a shell prompt and type the command I want. Since it's always posible to get to the shell from any program, it takes no time. If you find editing a config file easier, then go for it. That is what makes the Unix world so cool, you have many ways to do the same thing. Kenny On Fri, Feb 28, 2003 at 04:10:37PM -0600, Luke Davis wrote: > That is good, and gives me an interesting idea, which I will investigate. > > However, I would still like your opinion re what I wrote earlier. Would a > unified, more free-form (keyword value option keyword value option), > type config file or interface, be of more use to you, and as such would it > be worth my time investigating? > > Thanks > > Luke