From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from dsl092-170-086.wdc1.dsl.speakeasy.net ([66.92.170.86] helo=cantata.rednote.net) by speech.braille.uwo.ca with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 17vSPU-0000lL-00 for ; Sat, 28 Sep 2002 20:58:12 -0400 Received: from cantata.rednote.net (cantata.rednote.net [127.0.0.1]) by cantata.rednote.net (8.12.3/8.12.3/Debian -4) with ESMTP id g8T0wA1g013323 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=FAIL) for ; Sat, 28 Sep 2002 20:58:11 -0400 Received: (from janina@localhost) by cantata.rednote.net (8.12.3/8.12.3/Debian -4) id g8T0wAY0013321 for speakup@braille.uwo.ca; Sat, 28 Sep 2002 20:58:10 -0400 Date: Sat, 28 Sep 2002 20:58:10 -0400 From: Janina Sajka To: speakup@braille.uwo.ca Subject: Re: red hat 8.0 and the Speakup Modified Message-ID: <20020929005809.GM10984@rednote.net> References: <20020929000901.GB6910@kitten.net.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i X-Operating-System: Linux cantata 2.4.16 Sender: speakup-admin@braille.uwo.ca Errors-To: speakup-admin@braille.uwo.ca X-BeenThere: speakup@braille.uwo.ca X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: speakup@braille.uwo.ca List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Speakup is a screen review system for Linux. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Adam Myrow writes: > > On Sun, 29 Sep 2002, Aaron Howell wrote: > > > Yes, at the boot prompt you still need to type > > text speakup_synth=xxx > > So, what you are saying is that the default kernel will have Speakup. > Won't that be a nuisance for a sighted user? Why would this be a nuisance for the sighted user? Why is having Speakup in the kernel more of a nuisance than any other element of the kernel, which some user may or may not need?