From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [204.233.198.50] (helo=linserver.romualt.dhs.org) by speech.braille.uwo.ca with smtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 17A0gU-0002nl-00 for ; Mon, 20 May 2002 23:51:38 -0400 Received: (qmail 23551 invoked by uid 1002); 21 May 2002 03:51:10 -0000 Date: Mon, 20 May 2002 22:51:10 -0500 From: Gregory Nowak To: speakup@braille.uwo.ca Subject: Re: interesting experiment. Message-ID: <20020520225110.A23544@romualt.dhs.org> References: <20020520155417.H5306@joana.gotss.net> <20020520201154.C154@lnx3.holmesgrown.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <20020520201154.C154@lnx3.holmesgrown.com>; from steve@holmesgrown.com on Mon, May 20, 2002 at 08:11:56PM -0700 Sender: speakup-admin@braille.uwo.ca Errors-To: speakup-admin@braille.uwo.ca X-BeenThere: speakup@braille.uwo.ca X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.9 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: speakup@braille.uwo.ca List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Speakup is a screen review system for Linux. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Does the S key always work for you? I've found that it only works on a few of Toby's messages. Greg On Mon, May 20, 2002 at 08:11:56PM -0700, Steve Holmes wrote: > Ahh but quoting the relevant is much easier when all is quoted in > reverse order. Now that I'm replying to your's this way, I have to > edit out the middle. Fortuneately, emacs allows for easy editing such > as this. Yes, I'm usually lazy and probably most often push in my > reply and then send it on its way. > > I usually very much dislike having to go through the old stuff before > getting to the good/current stuff. But then mutt came along into my > life and I can now hit the 'S' key to magically skip over the old and > get to the new; if it is interspersed withother old text, then I can > hit the 'S' key again and I skip up to the next block. Sure makes > mail reading much faster. Mutt is the only e-mail client where I have > found this feature. > > On Tue, May 21, 2002 at 02:03:40AM +0100, Toby Fisher wrote: > >... > > > > Kerry, > > > > This is, imho, but another symptom of what you have already spoken about. > > I won't start a flame war here about the order of quoted and original > > text, I've been there, there's no point, nobody will change my mind and I > > expect the feeling's mutual for those who hold the opposing view. All I > > will say is that it seems that if the original text is at the top, there > > seems to be a greater temptation to just hit send and let it go, no > > editting of what's underneath, though of course this is not universal. > > _______________________________________________ > Speakup mailing list > Speakup@braille.uwo.ca > http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup