From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [204.233.198.50] (helo=linserver.complex) by speech.braille.uwo.ca with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 16lxNO-0006aY-00 for ; Fri, 15 Mar 2002 14:28:30 -0500 Received: (from gnowak1@localhost) by linserver.complex (8.11.4/8.10.2) id g2FJRq004287 for speakup@braille.uwo.ca; Fri, 15 Mar 2002 13:27:52 -0600 Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2002 13:27:52 -0600 From: Gregory Nowak To: speakup@braille.uwo.ca Subject: Re: FW: USA: Online book-sharing service for the blind borrows a page from Napster Message-ID: <20020315132752.A4278@uic.edu> References: <15505.57772.579267.621067@akp.selfhost.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: ; from janina@afb.net on Fri, Mar 15, 2002 at 01:30:30PM -0500 Sender: speakup-admin@braille.uwo.ca Errors-To: speakup-admin@braille.uwo.ca X-BeenThere: speakup@braille.uwo.ca X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.8 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: speakup@braille.uwo.ca List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Speakup is a screen review system for Linux. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: I humbley disagree that the windows ocr programs should be dumpped. First, the ocr engine in something like gocr is not as good as it is in openbook for example. In fact, I believe that someone on this list stated a while back that they thought that openbook ruby had the best ocr engine out there. Second, even though there may be kernel drivers for them, SANE doesn't support every scanner out there. This is why the windows ocr packages cannot be dumpped, at least not until they are comparible in their performance to their gnu/linux counterparts. Greg On Fri, Mar 15, 2002 at 01:30:30PM -0500, Janina Sajka wrote: > Forget OpenBook and K1000 and all that Windows stuff, > use scanimage and gocr from the command line. It works. > > > On Fri, 15 Mar 2002, Ann Parsons wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > Gena, a couple of misconceptions here. First, one doesn't have to buy > > the book in order to scan it. One can request the book from a regular > > library and scan it. As for the cost of K1000 or Ruby, yes, these do > > cost, and it is a shame that such things have to cost as much as they > > do. > > > > There are scholarships available through various organizations, > > apparently. I think what they are trying to do is to get Lions or > > something similar to donate the money so that folks who can not afford > > the fee will be able to do so. I think they are also looking for > > organizations who want to scan books. > > > > I know it looks like things are sort of skewed, and I know they need > > to do more about getting access via Lynx and that, but the idea is > > sound. > > > > I'm not sure what formats they require. I do know that there are > > strict rules about not submitting stuff that has been scanned for you, > > like text books and all, or propriatary materials from a university. > > They're working on all this. It's only a couple of weeks old. > > They'll work out the kinks. > > > > Ann P. > > > > > > -- > > Janina Sajka, Director > Technology Research and Development > Governmental Relations Group > American Foundation for the Blind (AFB) > > Email: janina@afb.net Phone: (202) 408-8175 > > Chair, Accessibility SIG > Open Electronic Book Forum (OEBF) > http://www.openebook.org > > > _______________________________________________ > Speakup mailing list > Speakup@braille.uwo.ca > http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup