From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from 12-239-160-151.client.attbi.com ([12.239.160.151] helo=kc5eiv ident=mail) by speech.braille.uwo.ca with esmtp (Exim 3.32 #1 (Debian)) id 16QIBC-0007pJ-00 for ; Mon, 14 Jan 2002 20:14:22 -0500 Received: from kc5eiv by kc5eiv with local (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 16QIC9-000083-00 for ; Mon, 14 Jan 2002 19:15:21 -0600 Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2002 19:15:21 -0600 To: speakup@braille.uwo.ca Subject: braille fonts Message-ID: <20020115011520.GA479@kc5eiv.ddts.net> Mail-Followup-To: speakup@braille.uwo.ca References: <20020114184610.A400@uic.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.25i From: William Hubbs Sender: speakup-admin@braille.uwo.ca Errors-To: speakup-admin@braille.uwo.ca X-BeenThere: speakup@braille.uwo.ca X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.7 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: speakup@braille.uwo.ca List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Speakup is a screen review system for Linux. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Would braille still be readable if we decreased the size? If we decreased it too much, I don't think we would be able to read it. William On Mon, Jan 14, 2002 at 07:12:27PM -0600, Kirk Wood wrote: > > hahahahahahaha. Let's do away with print anyway (grin). > > Greg > > Of course we could work on making smaller braille fonts. If you shrink the > spacing by just 20% you would fit so much more on the page. > > ======= > Kirk Wood > Cpt.Kirk@1tree.net > > Nowlan's Theory: > He who hesitates is not only lost, but several miles from > the next freeway exit. > > > > _______________________________________________ > Speakup mailing list > Speakup@braille.uwo.ca > http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup