From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from saidin.asmodean.net ([216.254.102.192]) by speech.braille.uwo.ca with esmtp (Exim 3.32 #1 (Debian)) id 16PAUj-00013b-00 for ; Fri, 11 Jan 2002 17:49:54 -0500 Received: from raul by saidin.asmodean.net with local (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 16PAUI-0000gb-00 for ; Fri, 11 Jan 2002 16:49:26 -0600 Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2002 16:49:26 -0600 To: speakup@braille.uwo.ca Subject: Re: suggestions for Speakup Message-ID: <20020111224926.GA2607@asmodean.net> Mail-Followup-To: speakup@braille.uwo.ca References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.25i From: "Raul A. Gallegos" Sender: speakup-admin@braille.uwo.ca Errors-To: speakup-admin@braille.uwo.ca X-BeenThere: speakup@braille.uwo.ca X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.7 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: speakup@braille.uwo.ca List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Speakup is a screen review system for Linux. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Kirk Reiser said the following on Fri, Jan 11, 2002 at 09:48:17AM -0500: > On another note, mentioning that something should be there because it > is part of windows/dos screen review packages is a non-starter with > me. That means we should do something because it is available in that > other o.s. I base what needs to be done on what features seem > reasonable to provide better access to linux. I am not at all > interested in keeping up with those other packages. So if you folks > want to make a comparison based on features, you might as well just > piss off. In that case Kirk. How about scripting support for speakup. *big grin* Oh, and don't forget about adding msaa support as well for using lynx. lol. Sorry, I could not pass that one up. I'll go back to my hole now. -- We are writing this e-mail to inform you that the mail server is down. Please do not call the help desk for assistance. To see the progress of any outage refer to your e-mail notifications. Raul A. Gallegos - http://www.asmodean.net