From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <romualt@megsinet.net>
Received: from
 linserver.megsinet.net(tnt14a-210.focal-chi.corecomm.net[216.214.203.210])
 (1082 bytes) by braille.uwo.ca
	via smail with P:esmtp/D:aliases/T:pipe
	(sender: <romualt@megsinet.net>)
	id <m14zMtk-0013utC@braille.uwo.ca>
	for <speakup@braille.uwo.ca>; Mon, 14 May 2001 14:16:48 -0400 (EDT)
	(Smail-3.2.0.102 1998-Aug-2 #2 built 1999-Sep-5)
Received: (from romualt@localhost)
	by linserver.megsinet.net (8.10.2/8.10.2) id f4EIPYZ00315
	for speakup@braille.uwo.ca; Mon, 14 May 2001 13:25:34 -0500
Date: Mon, 14 May 2001 13:25:34 -0500
From: Gregory Nowak <romualt@megsinet.net>
To: speakup@braille.uwo.ca
Subject: Re: Massive patch failures
Message-ID: <20010514132534.B307@linserver.megsinet.net>
References: 
 <Pine.LNX.4.21.0105140608050.25477-100000@c1422183-a.ross1.pa.home.com>
 <Pine.LNX.4.30.0105140915210.3423-100000@maranatha>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2i
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.30.0105140915210.3423-100000@maranatha>;
 from chomiak@worldfront.com on Mon, May 14, 2001 at 09:25:01AM -0700
List-Id: <speakup.linux-speakup.org>

It looks like speakup should work just fine despite of theese if you compile the kernel with it. However, let somebody who knows more confirm or disagree with this asessment.
Greg