From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from moose.erie.net([208.138.204.11]) (1500 bytes) by braille.uwo.ca via smail with P:esmtp/D:aliases/T:pipe (sender: ) id for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2001 20:26:22 -0500 (EST) (Smail-3.2.0.102 1998-Aug-2 #2 built 1999-Sep-5) Received: from jslt (dap-208-166-66-222.erie-tnt-1.pa.erie.net [208.166.66.222]) by moose.erie.net (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f2C1P7N25233 for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2001 20:25:07 -0500 (EST) Received: from jacobs by jslt with local (Exim 3.22 #1 (Debian)) id 14cGpQ-0002Bb-00 for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2001 20:08:52 -0500 Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2001 20:08:51 -0500 To: speakup@braille.uwo.ca Subject: Re: modified doubletalk speech server? Message-ID: <20010311200851.A8390@ncinter.net> References: <20010311142341.A8097@ncinter.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.15i In-Reply-To: ; from p019077b@pb.seflin.org on Sun, Mar 11, 2001 at 06:21:20PM -0500 From: Jacob Schmude List-Id: Hi No, this does not work. Some serial calls to set handshaking, etc, fail and thus it will not establish communication. This is with a doubletalk LT. With a doubletalk PC, the speech server doesn't even seem to get that far. On Sun, Mar 11, 2001 at 06:21:20PM -0500, Ryan Mann wrote: > > > In the latest version of Speakup you can use /dev/synth to talk to your > doubletalk. I would think you could use that for Emacspeak.