From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from executioner.lis.net.au([203.35.83.3]) (2012 bytes) by braille.uwo.ca via smail with P:esmtp/D:aliases/T:pipe (sender: ) id for ; Wed, 25 Oct 2000 04:03:07 -0400 (EDT) (Smail-3.2.0.102 1998-Aug-2 #2 built 1999-Sep-5) Received: from uucp by executioner.lis.net.au with local-rmail (Exim 2.05 #1) id 13oLWb-0007mR-00 (Debian); Wed, 25 Oct 2000 19:03:05 +1100 Received: from kerry by gotss.eu.org with local (Exim 3.12 #1) id 13oKz7-0000C1-00 (Debian); Wed, 25 Oct 2000 18:28:29 +1100 Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2000 18:28:29 +1100 From: Kerry Hoath To: speakup@braille.uwo.ca Subject: Re: which prebuilt linux boxes seem to work best? Message-ID: <20001025182829.I642@gotss.eu.org> References: <3.0.6.32.20001023211252.007af280@mail.ufw2.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii User-Agent: Mutt/1.0.1i In-Reply-To: ; from gshang10@scu.edu.au on Tue, Oct 24, 2000 at 05:29:13PM +1100 List-Id: Sadly NT has mail and office interoperability that Linux does not have currently. A correctly configured exchange server can do amazing such as scheduling and the like; ldap lookups, if you send a message to multiple ppl under exchange 2000 it creates 1 copy on the server and clones it when the users read it a great space saver. I want that functionality for Linux and a decent mailer that understands x.400 and ldap :-) On Tue, Oct 24, 2000 at 05:29:13PM +1100, Geoff Shang wrote: > Hi: > > I believe NT is rated to only be able to run successfully for a given > number of days, so a daily reboot wouldn't surprise me. Then again, why > anyone uses NT is beyond me. > > Geoff. > > > -- > Geoff Shang > ICQ number 43634701 > > > _______________________________________________ > Speakup mailing list > Speakup@braille.uwo.ca > http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup -- -- Kerry Hoath: kerry@gotss.eu.org Alternates: kerry@emusys.com.au kerry@gotss.spice.net.au or khoath@lis.net.au ICQ UIN: 62823451