From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail0131.smtp25.com (mail0131.smtp25.com [75.126.84.131]) by befuddled.reisers.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 974321EF72C for ; Fri, 10 May 2013 09:38:43 -0400 (EDT) Received: from ccs.covici.com (d-out-001.smtp25.com [67.228.158.174] (may be forged)) by d-out-001.smtp25.com (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id r4ADcaA7028991 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL) for ; Fri, 10 May 2013 09:38:36 -0400 Received: from ccs.covici.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ccs.covici.com (8.14.6/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r4ADcZkK001494 for ; Fri, 10 May 2013 09:38:36 -0400 To: speakup@linux-speakup.org Subject: Re: Fwd: Re: speakup issues In-reply-to: <20130509235112.GD2123@linux1> References: <20130509235112.GD2123@linux1> Comments: In-reply-to William Hubbs message dated "Thu, 09 May 2013 18:51:12 -0500." X-Mailer: MH-E 8.2; nmh 1.3; GNU Emacs 23.4.2 Date: Fri, 10 May 2013 09:38:35 -0400 Message-ID: <1493.1368193115@ccs.covici.com> From: covici@ccs.covici.com X-SpamH-OriginatingIP: 70.109.53.110 X-SpamH-Filter: d-out-001.smtp25.com-r4ADcaA7028991 X-BeenThere: speakup@linux-speakup.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list Reply-To: "Speakup is a screen review system for Linux." List-Id: "Speakup is a screen review system for Linux." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 May 2013 13:38:44 -0000 Well, that does not sound so bad -- a lot of small things. What is checkpatch.pl ? Also, Does Greg have a better idea for the serial stuff? William Hubbs wrote: > ----- Forwarded message from Greg KH ----- > > > Date: Thu, 9 May 2013 13:47:19 -0700 > > From: Greg KH > > To: William Hubbs > > Cc: devel@driverdev.osuosl.org > > Subject: Re: speakup issues > > > > On Thu, May 09, 2013 at 10:59:58AM -0500, William Hubbs wrote: > > > Hi Greg, > > > > Hi. Note my email change, you probably got the bounce from the old > > suse.de address already... > > > > > I am writing to you and to this list because I'm not quite sure where > > > else to write to ask this. > > > > > > For those on the list who do not know me, I am one of the developers > > > working on Speakup. > > > > > > I am interested in collecting a list of things that would need to happen > > > to allow speakup to move from staging to mainline. Is this list the > > > place to get that kind of information? > > > > > > Greg, if you decide when things can move, can you give me a list of > > > things that we need to look into fixing? > > > > > > I'm sure the speakup serial i/o code is one of those things, but what > > > else needs to be done? > > > > Dan has given you a great list of things to work on, start with that. > > > > Running checkpatch.pl is a great place to start with. The serial stuff > > can be worked on as well, there are better ways to resolve that problem. > > > > Also, please remove all the BUG_ON() instances, no driver should ever be > > able to instantly stop a machine, with no chance of it to be revived, > > that's just not nice. > > > > thanks, > > > > greg k-h > > ----- End forwarded message ----- > _______________________________________________ > Speakup mailing list > Speakup@linux-speakup.org > http://linux-speakup.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/speakup -- Your life is like a penny. You're going to lose it. The question is: How do you spend it? John Covici covici@ccs.covici.com