From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from moose.erie.net([208.138.204.11]) (2029 bytes) by braille.uwo.ca via smail with P:esmtp/D:aliases/T:pipe (sender: ) id for ; Wed, 18 Oct 2000 22:13:17 -0400 (EDT) (Smail-3.2.0.102 1998-Aug-2 #2 built 1999-Sep-5) Received: from jscp (dap-208-166-66-242.erie-tnt-1.pa.erie.net [208.166.66.242]) by moose.erie.net (8.9.2/8.9.1) with ESMTP id WAA27050 for ; Wed, 18 Oct 2000 22:12:28 -0400 (EDT) X-Envelope-To: Received: from jacobs by jscp with local (Exim 3.16 #1 (Debian)) id 13m5AT-0000ak-00 for ; Wed, 18 Oct 2000 22:10:53 -0400 From: Jacob Schmude MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <14830.22572.979709.754303@ncinter.net> Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2000 22:10:52 -0400 To: speakup@braille.uwo.ca Subject: Re: CVS speakup with 2.4.0-test9 (was Re: emacs terminal devices) In-Reply-To: References: <14817.25481.20894.433603@jscp.yi.org> <14829.64477.233640.359163@ncinter.net> X-Mailer: VM 6.76 under Emacs 20.7.2 List-Id: Hi Kirk I'm running test9 now with speakup not in it. Of course I need to use emacspeak, so I can't really test everything, but the system boots and operates. Actually, I needed to recompile do to the way my kernel got installed, I just answered N to speakup when doing this and I got a bootable kernel again. So, it's something with speakup, but as the kernel gives no output that may be a hard one to find. Kirk Reiser writes: > Hmmm, that's exactly the same problem that others are reporting. I > haven't tried it yet on test9 but I have it running just fine on > test8. I will try it here at home on my box with test9 sometime in > the next day or so. Does test9 compile and run fine without speakup > patched in? I realize that may not be an easy thing to test, but I > was curious whether you had tried it?