From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from s1.cableone.net ([24.116.0.227]) by speech.braille.uwo.ca with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1DzERG-0000Qe-00 for ; Sun, 31 Jul 2005 10:05:15 -0400 Received: from desktop (unverified [24.116.252.22]) by S1.cableone.net (CableOne SMTP Service S1) with ESMTP id 27070308 for ; Sun, 31 Jul 2005 07:04:57 -0700 Message-ID: <04f101c595d8$ce982840$6a00a8c0@desktop> From: "Glenn at home" To: "Speakup is a screen review system for Linux." References: <20050730094321.GB31567@continuum><20050730135923.GD13054@rednote.net><20050730140759.GI18137@tomass.dyndns.org><20050731061556.GA2779@taylor.homelinux.net> Date: Sun, 31 Jul 2005 09:04:45 -0500 Organization: Home MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2527 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2527 X-IP-stats: Incoming Last 2, First 11, in=29, out=0, spam=0 X-External-IP: 24.116.252.22 X-Abuse-Info: Send abuse complaints to abuse@cableone.net Subject: Re: Quoting X-BeenThere: speakup@braille.uwo.ca X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Glenn at home , "Speakup is a screen review system for Linux." List-Id: "Speakup is a screen review system for Linux." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 31 Jul 2005 14:05:15 -0000 Also, for anyone else who might not like quoting, if the quoting occurs after the message, then it is not a problem for anyone. I also don't like the quoting at the top, because most of the time I don't want to read through it, but it is nice to have it below. Glenn ----- Original Message ----- From: "Karen Lewellen" To: "Speakup is a screen review system for Linux." Sent: Sunday, July 31, 2005 7:19 AM Subject: Re: Quoting Lorenzo, With all due respect, this may not be true. People are joining all the time, and even those here are searching the archives when looking for something. Sometimes a thread shifts and the first part of it or the source question is no longer clear. Therefore at least in a information based list like this repeating that message both gives readers a chance to follow the discussion, and may even save time in having a topic repeated. Does this make sense? Karen On Sun, 31 Jul 2005, Lorenzo Taylor wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Sorry. I don't quote unless I absolutely have to. I feel that quoting > wastes the reader's time since he/she has already read the same message > once, twice or even 5 times already. Why should I add to that problem? > > Lorenzo > - -- > - -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK----- > Version: 3.12 > GCS d- s:+ a- C+++ UL++++ P+ L+++ E- W++ N o K- w--- > O M V- PS+++ PE Y+ PGP++ t++ 5+ X+ R tv-- b++ DI-- D+ > G e* h---- r+++ y+++ > - ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------ > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) > > iD8DBQFC7GycG9IpekrhBfIRAvA7AJ9zxbrRmI7aHxBuPXZgpQuiveTonACgmAOj > nedF/D8UBBiexS5igbHNObM= > =O9eN > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > _______________________________________________ > Speakup mailing list > Speakup@braille.uwo.ca > http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup > _______________________________________________ Speakup mailing list Speakup@braille.uwo.ca http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup