From: Jason <unleet@qwest.net>
To: speakup@braille.uwo.ca
Subject: Re: Newbie, Adding Speakup to existing RH7.2 installation
Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2002 18:39:22 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <02011318392203.31197@lightstar> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0201131825540.29100-100000@wb2flw.octothorp.org>
> Please explain to me, if you can, the disadvantages of having modules in
> your setup that you never load.
not many: they take up space, and can cause problems if accidentally loaded
with no hardware to talk to. Other than those, I can't think of any, but
besides making hardware upgrades a bit easier, I can't think of any
advantages either. I'd say it balances, and that it can be left as a personal
preference thing.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~ UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
Joe Clever
` Jason
` Geoff Shang
` Janina Sajka
` Thomas Ward
` William F. Acker WB2FLW +1-303-777-8123
` Jason [this message]
` William F. Acker WB2FLW +1-303-777-8123
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=02011318392203.31197@lightstar \
--to=unleet@qwest.net \
--cc=speakup@braille.uwo.ca \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).