public inbox for speakup@linux-speakup.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Wil James" <wil@wilanddenise.com>
To: "'Speakup is a screen review system for Linux.'"
	<speakup@braille.uwo.ca>
Subject: RE: Re[2]: Owasys 22C Screenless Cellphone
Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2006 10:26:41 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <013501c6ab3f$5aacef10$0201a8c0@max2> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BAY103-DAV8E078A48BFBBB3BB4CE328E600@phx.gbl>

Hi Michael
 
"There are alternatives to the Owasys which offer the same functionality
(possibly more), such as a symbian phone and talks." 

If I remember correctly, you cannot text message with the LG4500 phones.

"Maybe in your case the cost difference was greater, but for me buying a
symbian phone and talks was only marginly more expensive than a Owasys (my
feeling was the little extra was worth having a phone which has a large user
base, should have very few bugs, and if any updates are needed can be done
locally and not mean I will be without my phone for any significant time," 

Take into account, $199 for TALX for Cingular for a one year contract, and
$99 for a two year contract.  Toss in the cost of the phone, which can go
over $150.  yes, you go get credit for the Talx, but you have to shell out
the money in advance.  You're talking at least $250 to $400 just to get set
up with Talx.  MobileSpeak costs $399 itself.  The Owasys22C costs only
$200.00, less than half what you would pay for the other solutions out
there.
Who says a SIM card can't be sent to your address of you want updates?

"plenty of extras available if I wanted something for my phone (and not just
nokia originals), and the specialist bit could be removed if there was any
problem caused by that leaving me with a fully functional phone)."

What could you do with your phone if the specialist bit was removed?  Not
nearly what you could with it loaded.

"While all that seems very negative about it, I will accept for some an
Owasys may be the correct choice (may be you fall in that category), but
equally I feel that some choose it for the wrong reason (I am struggling to
find quite the wording I want, reasons such as it is what they believe is
accessible to them, because they think things with a screen has been
visually designed so could never be accessible)."

Wrong in my case.  I have a computer, and I do use Windows.  It, too, has a
monitor, but I don't shy away from it just because pictures are displayed on
the monitor.  That's about the most vain thing I've heard.

"I feel I now need to try and restrain myself as I am getting close to my
strong feelings, and I don't really feel this is really sufficiently on
topic for this list. We may just have to agree to differ on this if anyone
disagrees with what I have said."

I do see your points, and they're good ones for debate.

----- Original Message -----
From: "David Poehlman" <david.poehlman@handsontechnologeyes.com>
To: "Speakup is a screen review system for Linux." <speakup@braille.uwo.ca>
Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2006 11:13 AM
Subject: Re: Re[2]: Owasys 22C Screenless Cellphone


>I will buy and use off the shelf products when possible.  In our case 
>tthough, we needed the functionality.
>
> It's new, many things start out as new.  Hopefully it'lll catch on  and 
> then we'll have a product we can use that is truly embedded.
>

_______________________________________________
Speakup mailing list
Speakup@braille.uwo.ca
http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup





  parent reply	other threads:[~ UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
 ace
 ` W. Nick Dotson
   ` Wil James
     ` Cheryl Homiak
       ` Lorenzo Taylor
         ` Cheryl Homiak
         ` Re[2]: " Farhan
           ` Sean McMahon
           ` Michael Whapples
             ` David Poehlman
               ` W. Nick Dotson
               ` Michael Whapples
                 ` David Poehlman
                   ` Re[4]: " Farhan
                     ` David Poehlman
                       ` Sean M McMahon
                       ` Adam Myrow
                         ` Gregory Nowak
                         ` Michael Whapples
                 ` Wil James [this message]
                   ` Re[2]: " W. Nick Dotson
                     ` Gregory Nowak
     [not found]                   ` <cone.1153334728.2370.9860.0@tux>
                     ` Michael Whapples
                   ` Re[4]: " Farhan
                     ` Sean M McMahon
                 ` Re[2]: " Janina Sajka
             ` ace
             ` Janina Sajka
         ` David Poehlman
         ` Wil James

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='013501c6ab3f$5aacef10$0201a8c0@max2' \
    --to=wil@wilanddenise.com \
    --cc=speakup@braille.uwo.ca \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).