From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from rhombus.bright.net ([205.212.123.75]) by speech.braille.uwo.ca with esmtp (Exim 3.32 #1 (Debian)) id 16Vxfe-0007Jy-00 for ; Wed, 30 Jan 2002 11:33:14 -0500 Received: from tward (woos-max1-cs-20.dial.bright.net [209.143.18.39]) by rhombus.bright.net (8.12.1/8.12.1) with SMTP id g0UGXA1I017487 for ; Wed, 30 Jan 2002 11:33:14 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <00af01c1a9ab$f12637c0$0100a8c0@tward> From: "Thomas Ward" To: References: Subject: Re: RH 6.2 Versus RH 7.2 Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2002 11:30:33 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2615.200 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2615.200 Sender: speakup-admin@braille.uwo.ca Errors-To: speakup-admin@braille.uwo.ca X-BeenThere: speakup@braille.uwo.ca X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.7 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: speakup@braille.uwo.ca List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Speakup is a screen review system for Linux. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Hi, yes. If you are doing a complete install of Red Hat 7.2, and you let it create the file systems for you audomatically it will do ext3. If you had an older ext2 file system in place when you did the install then you probably have ext2. I've never tried any type of fs conversion, and don't know if such a utility exists. ----- Original Message ----- From: Richard Villa To: Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 5:40 AM Subject: Re: RH 6.2 Versus RH 7.2 > When you do a clean install of RH7.2, does the system use the ext 3 FS > by default? > > If not, is there a way to do a convertion without having to do a > complete reinstall? > > Richard > On Tue, 29 Jan 2002, Thomas Ward wrote: > > > Well, I've noticed that slow down in spead myself. One way to help spead > > things up is to use the ext3 fs which works much better than ext2. > > One major difference between 6.2 and 7.2 is that 7.2 comes with the kudzu > > pnp hardware maniger. Kudzu tracks new and removed hardware, and attempts to > > configure it for you. > > A second change is the X-Windows server ois much newer, but on my 1.2 GHZ > > box the little drop in spead is worth getting all the new tools. At least > > for me. > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: Amanda Lee > > To: Speakup@Braille.Uwo.Ca > > Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2002 9:18 PM > > Subject: RH 6.2 Versus RH 7.2 > > > > > > > > > > Hmmm I know that it is likely that RH 6.2 with Speakup enabled does not > > have > > > the most current version of Speakup patched into the Kernel but here's an > > > interesting comment from a friend whose judgement I respect a good deal. > > > > > > So to the other experts herein, please share your thoughts. > > > > > > He prefers RH 6.2 for the following reason: > > > RH 7.2 seems to be significantly slower, with lots more disk thrashing, > > and > > > it's > > > not just X Windows (although it's also significantly slower). > > > > > > So my question is... What is enabled in RH 7.2 that you won't see in RH > > 6.2 > > > > > > Amanda Lee > > > Alexandria, VA > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Speakup mailing list > > > Speakup@braille.uwo.ca > > > http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Speakup mailing list > > Speakup@braille.uwo.ca > > http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Speakup mailing list > Speakup@braille.uwo.ca > http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup