public inbox for speakup@linux-speakup.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Thomas Ward" <tward@bright.net>
To: <speakup@braille.uwo.ca>
Subject: Re: speakup 1.0 and slackware 8.0
Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2001 16:15:25 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <008701c19240$44232240$0100a8c0@tward> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0112310845200.17766-100000@lbear>

Hi, kirk. It is true most sited people use alot of things via xterm, but
think how many commandline apps there are that are not x based. Gcc comes to
mind.

Well, I know there is a new x server in Red Hat 7.2 and from what mmy family
tells me it seams to operate pretty good. They use it more than I do, and
they seam to like it alright.

At least it is a low cost alternative to MS Windows, and we can expect x to
get more stable as development is done to it to improve it.


----- Original Message -----
From: Kirk Wood <cpt.kirk@1tree.net>
To: <speakup@braille.uwo.ca>
Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 9:52 AM
Subject: Re: speakup 1.0 and slackware 8.0


> On Tue, 1 Jan 2002, Shaun Oliver wrote:
> > I'm in agreement with you.
> > the shell is not for everyone.
> > but having said that, if people think that lthe x-windows system is
> > going to be like ms windows, they have another thing coming.
> > they'll be both pleasantly surprised and in for a nasty shock.
> > in as much as with linux there isn't as many crashes as there is with
> > windows but by the same token, it pays to learn as much about your
> > machine as possible because linux isn't going to hand hold anybody
> > either.
>
> First, I want to challenge the notion that the sighted world all uses
> X. Many of us (I am a sightling) don't. I will say the majority
> due. Perhaps an overwhelming majority do. But the impression I have gotten
> when I last went to a Linux User Group in the Dallas area is that many
> still use a command shell window within X.
>
> As for the stability factor, I haven't tried X in about 2 years. But 2
> years ago X had a long way to hve the stability of WIndows 9.x. I know
> that is blasphemy, but it is the truth. Perhaps the latest version are
> much better. I know that XFree has moved into the 4 series. But don't
> think that for a minute XFree 3 is as stable as Windows. I simply isn't,
> the good news being that you don't have to take the entire system down to
> recover. But if you have to restart the Windows, you have still lost
> everything that was running in that session. And it is still unstable.
>
> I would compare XFree version 3 with Windows version 3.
>
> =======
> Kirk Wood
> Cpt.Kirk@1tree.net
>
> One of the most overlooked advantages to computers is...  If they do
> foul up, there's no law against whacking them around a little.
> -- Joe Martin
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Speakup mailing list
> Speakup@braille.uwo.ca
> http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup



  parent reply	other threads:[~ UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
 Reinhard Stebner
 ` Raul A. Gallegos
 ` Thomas Ward
   ` Reinhard Stebner
     ` Keith Creasy
       ` Thomas Ward
         ` Reinhard Stebner
           ` Thomas Ward
           ` Gregory Nowak
       ` Gregory Nowak
         ` Reinhard Stebner
           ` Thomas Ward
             ` Reinhard Stebner
               ` Gregory Nowak
           ` Gregory Nowak
             ` Reinhard Stebner
               ` Gregory Nowak
     ` Gregory Nowak
       ` Reinhard Stebner
         ` Charles Hallenbeck
           ` Reinhard Stebner
             ` Reinhard Stebner
             ` Charles Hallenbeck
     ` Thomas Ward
       ` Jason
         ` Gregory Nowak
           ` Thomas Ward
             ` Gregory Nowak
         ` Thomas Ward
       ` Gregory Nowak
         ` Thomas Ward
         ` Reinhard Stebner
           ` Gregory Nowak
       ` Reinhard Stebner
         ` Thomas Ward
           ` Gregory Nowak
             ` Janina Sajka
               ` Gregory Nowak
             ` Reinhard Stebner
               ` Gregory Nowak
         ` Gregory Nowak
       ` Geoff Shang
         ` Gregory Nowak
         ` Thomas Ward
           ` Gregory Nowak
           ` Shaun Oliver
             ` Kirk Wood
               ` Shaun Oliver
               ` Thomas Ward [this message]
             ` Thomas Ward

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='008701c19240$44232240$0100a8c0@tward' \
    --to=tward@bright.net \
    --cc=speakup@braille.uwo.ca \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).