From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from ns.pcdesk.net ([65.100.173.137] helo=gwen.pcdesk.net) by speech.braille.uwo.ca with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1AKuAE-0005KS-00 for ; Sat, 15 Nov 2003 01:44:10 -0500 Received: (qmail 8070 invoked from network); 15 Nov 2003 06:43:31 -0000 Received: from localhost (HELO pcdesk.net) (127.0.0.1) by gwen.pcdesk.net with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP; 15 Nov 2003 06:43:31 -0000 X-MessageWall-Score: 0 (pcdesk.net) Received: from [65.100.173.138] (authenticated as jbahm) by pcdesk.net (MessageWall 1.0.8) with SMTP (encrypted with RC4-MD5); 15 Nov 2003 6:43:31 -0000 Message-ID: <007801c3ab43$cd1a0960$6700a8c0@morgan> From: "Joseph C. Lininger" To: "Speakup is a screen review system for Linux." References: <20031113225839.GA9654@romuald.net.eu.org> Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2003 23:43:38 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 Subject: Re: 2.4.22 X-BeenThere: speakup@braille.uwo.ca X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.3 Precedence: list Reply-To: "Speakup is a screen review system for Linux." List-Id: Speakup is a screen review system for Linux. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2003 06:44:10 -0000 I've been using it on my server and my desktop for quite a while with absolutely no problems. --- Joseph C. Lininger jbahm@pcdesk.net >>From the "Joe Wonders" department: If a mnemonic device is supposed to help people remember things, why is it that no one can spell the word, pronounce the word, or even remember what the word means? ----- Original Message ----- From: "Luke Davis" To: "Speakup is a screen review system for Linux." Sent: Friday, November 14, 2003 12:13 AM Subject: 2.4.22 > Does anyone else hold this opinion (that 2.4.22 is crap)? I am in the > processof compiling it on a live commercial server, and would like > opinions of this. > > Luke > On Thu, 13 Nov 2003, Gregory Nowak wrote: > > > Hi all. > > > > The subject says it all. I went back to linux 2.4.21, and the box > > works like a charm. No segmentation faults, no inactivity for long > > periods, it's all gone. > > > > Thanks to all who provided suggestions/help, but in the end it turned > > out that 2.4.22 is a piece of crap. > > That's my personal opinion, which I have the right to state, so no > > flames please. > > > > Greg > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Speakup mailing list > Speakup@braille.uwo.ca > http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup >