From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lakecmmtao04.coxmail.com ([68.99.120.78]) by speech.braille.uwo.ca with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1CzIBK-0003Up-00 for ; Thu, 10 Feb 2005 12:32:46 -0500 Received: from DJTWWQ41 ([68.225.88.38]) by lakecmmtao04.coxmail.com (InterMail vM.6.01.04.00 201-2131-118-20041027) with SMTP id <20050210173211.LAZI1295.lakecmmtao04.coxmail.com@DJTWWQ41> for ; Thu, 10 Feb 2005 12:32:11 -0500 Message-ID: <005201c50f96$702c7540$6401a8c0@DJTWWQ41> From: "John McCann" To: "Speakup is a screen review system for Linux." References: <200502101544.j1AFiIl3002071@uni07mr.unity.ncsu.edu> <20050210155534.GD18112@rednote.net> Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2005 12:32:01 -0500 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2527 X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Original X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2527 Subject: Trouble with Breaking and Entering X-BeenThere: speakup@braille.uwo.ca X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: "Speakup is a screen review system for Linux." List-Id: "Speakup is a screen review system for Linux." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2005 17:32:46 -0000 Janina writes: In fact, it's...[breaking and entering]...still "breaking and entering," even if there is no lock, as I understand things--though perhaps some lawyer among us might clarify this principal for us. Correct; and on the civil side, you're looking at liability for trespassing as well. Okay, enough cyber-lawyering for the day. John