From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mx-3.iquest.net ([206.246.180.53]) by speech.braille.uwo.ca with smtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1BgZuz-0003qc-00 for ; Fri, 02 Jul 2004 22:06:17 -0400 Received: (qmail 81361 invoked from network); 3 Jul 2004 02:06:16 -0000 Received: from dial-94-201-10-06.ind.iquest.net (HELO kleinloaner) (209.43.111.94) by mx-3.iquest.net with SMTP; 3 Jul 2004 02:06:16 -0000 Message-ID: <004901c460a2$52c7c9d0$5e6f2bd1@CCSCCHS.local> From: "Garrett Klein" To: "Speakup is a screen review system for Linux." References: <20040702175825.GA4608@romuald.net.eu.org> Date: Fri, 2 Jul 2004 21:06:14 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 Subject: Re: What should Festival do better? (was: Speech Dispatcher 0.5Release Candidate 1 available) X-BeenThere: speakup@braille.uwo.ca X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.4 Precedence: list Reply-To: "Speakup is a screen review system for Linux." List-Id: "Speakup is a screen review system for Linux." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 03 Jul 2004 02:06:18 -0000 Festival is under a BSD-style license. Garrett ----- Original Message ----- From: "Gregory Nowak" To: Sent: Friday, July 02, 2004 12:58 PM Subject: Re: What should Festival do better? (was: Speech Dispatcher 0.5Release Candidate 1 available) > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Well, frankly, festival sounds like garbage, worst then the Braille 'n > Speak or accent in my opinion. When I was using it with gnopernicus, I > found myself spending more time on understanding what festival was > saying, then I did on actually using gnopernicus and using gnome. Yes, > I know, festival is GPL software, and we should be happy that we have > a GPL software synth at all, but Hynek did ask for comments, so I'm > posting my own in an attempt to answer his question of what is wrong > with festival in my opinion, and not in an attempt to start a flame > war (smile). > > Greg > > On Fri, Jul 02, 2004 at 06:51:01PM +0200, Hynek Hanke wrote: > > What's the problem with Festival? I mean, what should Festival do > better > > so that you could use it instead of Dectalk or Eloquence? Or the > other > > hardware synthesizers. > > > > Of course, this is also a question for others. > > > > Regards, > > Hynek > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Speakup mailing list > > Speakup@braille.uwo.ca > > http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup > > > > > > > > > > > > - -- > Free domains: http://www.eu.org/ or mail dns-manager@EU.org > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux) > > iD8DBQFA5aJB7s9z/XlyUyARAsrpAJ9BUKbQRfp7+jR1Cs+wnafT416+pQCgqJul > Gs3CPrEzzIp9jr1vpwzoxmg= > =uWFA > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > _______________________________________________ > Speakup mailing list > Speakup@braille.uwo.ca > http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup >