From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from femail46.sdc1.sfba.home.com ([24.254.60.40]) by speech.braille.uwo.ca with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 16Wo6l-0006af-00 for ; Fri, 01 Feb 2002 19:32:43 -0500 Received: from cp286066a ([68.50.140.228]) by femail46.sdc1.sfba.home.com (InterMail vM.4.01.03.20 201-229-121-120-20010223) with SMTP id <20020202003247.RBTV25423.femail46.sdc1.sfba.home.com@cp286066a> for ; Fri, 1 Feb 2002 16:32:47 -0800 Message-ID: <002d01c1ab81$2300cb30$e48c3244@cp286066a> From: "David Poehlman" To: References: Subject: Re: So much Windows Mailer crap on this list... Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2002 19:32:45 -0500 Organization: Hands-on Technolog(eye)s MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 Sender: speakup-admin@braille.uwo.ca Errors-To: speakup-admin@braille.uwo.ca X-BeenThere: speakup@braille.uwo.ca X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.8 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: speakup@braille.uwo.ca List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Speakup is a screen review system for Linux. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: One thing that annoys me is the > signs in messages, You will notice that mine do not have them when I forward directly as below but we digress. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Janina Sajka" To: Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 5:49 PM Subject: Re: So much Windows Mailer crap on this list... Thomas: I think those three lines of information are supplied by Pine, so they're not in the message at the time procmail handles it. Therefore, they would need to be filtered inside Pine--which can be done, I think--it's just a tad complex, or I've just bin a tad lazy when I've looked at doing it. PS: I don't see any annoyance in your messages. Idealy it wouldn't matter what OS someone is using to send mail, but ideals are sometimes suborgated by parochial interested.