From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from hagus.bright.net ([205.212.123.74])
	by speech.braille.uwo.ca with esmtp (Exim 3.32 #1 (Debian))
	id 16SMLi-0007PR-00
	for <speakup@braille.uwo.ca>; Sun, 20 Jan 2002 13:05:47 -0500
Received: from tward (woos-max1-cs-7.dial.bright.net [209.143.18.26])
	by hagus.bright.net (8.12.1/8.12.1) with SMTP id g0KI5lYw015617
	for <speakup@braille.uwo.ca>; Sun, 20 Jan 2002 13:05:48 -0500 (EST)
Message-ID: <002601c1a1dd$2de7e0e0$0100a8c0@tward>
From: "Thomas Ward" <tward@bright.net>
To: <speakup@braille.uwo.ca>
References: <000a01c1a153$122bc360$c2f20141@cp286066a>
 <5.1.0.14.2.20020120082843.023c2a30@198.144.194.210>
Subject: Re: Will Redhat Become a Division of AOL Time-Warner?
Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2002 13:06:26 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2615.200
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2615.200
Sender: speakup-admin@braille.uwo.ca
Errors-To: speakup-admin@braille.uwo.ca
X-BeenThere: speakup@braille.uwo.ca
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.7
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: speakup@braille.uwo.ca
List-Help: <mailto:speakup-request@braille.uwo.ca?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:speakup@braille.uwo.ca>
List-Subscribe: <http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup>,
	<mailto:speakup-request@braille.uwo.ca?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Speakup is a screen review system for Linux. <speakup.braille.uwo.ca>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup>,
	<mailto:speakup-request@braille.uwo.ca?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/pipermail/speakup/>

This is really bad. I shutter to think what RedHat will be like if AOL gets
a hold of it.

----- Original Message -----
From: Charles Crawford <CCrawford@ACB.org>
To: <speakup@braille.uwo.ca>
Sent: Sunday, January 20, 2002 8:31 AM
Subject: Re: Will Redhat Become a Division of AOL Time-Warner?


>          I wish I could be as optimistic.  Actually, we will have to
demand
> that they keep the command line text runtime or they will simply do the
> migration thing where the GUI is updated and the text is
> forgotten.  Witness the disappearance of DOS.
>
> -- Charlie.
>
> >Linux already comes with a GUI, but it can safely be ignored.
> >
> >On Sat, 19 Jan 2002, David Poehlman wrote:
> >
> > > but of course, it won't be accessible because they'll slap a gui on it
> > > and lock it in.
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Speakup mailing list
> > > Speakup@braille.uwo.ca
> > > http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup
> > >
> >
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >Speakup mailing list
> >Speakup@braille.uwo.ca
> >http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Speakup mailing list
> Speakup@braille.uwo.ca
> http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup
>