From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from ool-182f16d9.dyn.optonline.net ([24.47.22.217]
	helo=hkcamp.gotdns.com)
	by speech.braille.uwo.ca with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
	id 1BmblE-0007jk-00
	for <speakup@braille.uwo.ca>; Mon, 19 Jul 2004 13:17:08 -0400
Received: from nickysp4 (unknown [192.168.0.204])
	by hkcamp.gotdns.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 9AC4EBCC50
	for <speakup@braille.uwo.ca>; Mon, 19 Jul 2004 13:16:27 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <002401c46db4$25b3d5a0$cc00a8c0@nickysp4>
From: "nick G" <nick@hkcamp.gotdns.com>
To: "Speakup is a screen review system for Linux." <speakup@braille.uwo.ca>
References: 
 <000601c46da5$883c4860$cc00a8c0@nickysp4><000501c46da9$b7d9a050$6801a8c0@Sina>
	<20040719164857.GB2446@romuald.net.eu.org>
Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2004 13:16:36 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1409
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409
Subject: Re: A good synth?
X-BeenThere: speakup@braille.uwo.ca
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.4
Precedence: list
Reply-To: "Speakup is a screen review system for Linux."
	<speakup@braille.uwo.ca>
List-Id: "Speakup is a screen review system for Linux."
	<speakup.braille.uwo.ca>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup>,
	<mailto:speakup-request@braille.uwo.ca?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://braille.uwo.ca/pipermail/speakup>
List-Post: <mailto:speakup@braille.uwo.ca>
List-Help: <mailto:speakup-request@braille.uwo.ca?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup>,
	<mailto:speakup-request@braille.uwo.ca?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2004 17:17:08 -0000

Just wish I could own one...hahahaha.  I use an Accent SA with speakup.
Thanks,
Nick
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Gregory Nowak" <greg@romuald.net.eu.org>
To: <sbahram@nc.rr.com>; "Speakup is a screen review system for Linux."
<speakup@braille.uwo.ca>
Sent: Monday, July 19, 2004 12:48 PM
Subject: Re: A good synth?


> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> I have to agree with Nick here. I think the doubletalk is the best
> synth I've heard to date. I even think it sounds better then the
> dectalk, though that maybe because I've used a doubletalk for about 6
> years now, compared to infrequently working with a dectalk, for an
> hour or less at a time, and there weren't many of those times.
>
> Greg
>
>
> On Mon, Jul 19, 2004 at 12:01:57PM -0400, Sina Bahram wrote:
> > Are you serious? Wow, I thought DoubleTalk had to be the worst one
> > ever....that's sad that hardware synths are so bad....
> >
> > Thanks for your reply
> >
> > Take care,
> > Sina
> >
>
> - -- 
> Free domains: http://www.eu.org/ or mail dns-manager@EU.org
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
>
> iD8DBQFA+/t57s9z/XlyUyARAnQzAKDE/VPd2lxj/ZoERzqljUyxV1yLRwCfUGLv
> OR8tSoC+5NvB0JIr6FmMDyk=
> =sN1O
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
> _______________________________________________
> Speakup mailing list
> Speakup@braille.uwo.ca
> http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup