From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from saidin.asmodean.net ([66.93.252.130]) by speech.braille.uwo.ca with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 17srTT-0005Cr-00 for ; Sat, 21 Sep 2002 17:07:35 -0400 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=rgallegos) by saidin.asmodean.net with smtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 17srSz-0005GN-00 for ; Sat, 21 Sep 2002 16:07:06 -0500 Message-ID: <001201c261b2$d605ea20$6f11ba3f@rgallegos> From: "Raul A. Gallegos" To: References: <5.1.0.14.2.20020920085936.02589150@198.144.194.210><000b01c260fc$f838eae0$41529718@nt.charterne.com><15755.47440.881040.969386@akp@eznet.net><20020921023906.GA6009@dalek> <15756.20399.89152.281507@akp@eznet.net> Subject: Re: NFB Net goes linux! Date: Sat, 21 Sep 2002 16:07:02 -0500 Organization: Asmodean MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 Sender: speakup-admin@braille.uwo.ca Errors-To: speakup-admin@braille.uwo.ca X-BeenThere: speakup@braille.uwo.ca X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: speakup@braille.uwo.ca List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Speakup is a screen review system for Linux. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Does everything have to be turned into an nfb bashing session? -- If you perceive that there are four possible ways in which a procedure can go wrong, and circumvent these, then a fifth way will promptly develop. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Ann Parsons" To: Sent: Saturday, September 21, 2002 5:53 AM Subject: Re: NFB Net goes linux! > Hi all, > > Well, now, old Buddy, one would think that his motives would be fueled > by logic. If one were going to buy or be given apparatus for > maintaining the email lists, web and so on of an organization, one > would desire the best equipment, but one would also make sure that it > was configurable by those who were going to use it. It makes no sense > to have equipment in one's office that one can not configure by > oneself. Even if the learning curve were steep, it would make sense > that any equipment should be flexible enough to be configured by the > blind and not the sighted. But then, who ever said members of that > organization thought logically or had a modicum of common sense?