From: "Al Puzzuoli" <alpuzz@comcast.net>
To: "Speakup is a screen review system for Linux." <speakup@braille.uwo.ca>
Subject: Re: Any alternate download sites for speakup ftp?
Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 20:18:13 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <001101c51ad7$e0d148b0$6900a8c0@systemax> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <000601c51aca$961742f0$6401a8c0@DJTWWQ41>
Hi john,
The confusion comes in here because when companies offer speed clames, they
do so measured in kBytes, and when downloading a program, your speed is
typically displayed in kbits. I'm no expert but the way I understand it is
as follows:
You can roughly ascertain the rate of speed you would obtain from the
advertised KByte number by dividing by 8. So for example, if your service
advertises 768 KByte up, you divide that by 8 and get 96. This means that
in an ideal scenario, if there were no overhead packets and your connection
were perfect, you would get 96 kbits per second. However if you account for
real world factors and overhead,you need to subtract a bit more from 96,
hense putting you right about at where you are, 70. I don't know if there
are better formuli out there to account for the overhead.
Things become even more confusing because when heard with speech, bothKb
and kb sound exactly the same.
Hope this makes some sense.
--Al
----- Original Message -----
From: "John McCann" <lists@jamsite.us>
To: "Speakup is a screen review system for Linux." <speakup@braille.uwo.ca>
Sent: Thursday, February 24, 2005 6:42 PM
Subject: Re: Any alternate download sites for speakup ftp?
> Al wrote:
>
> "Right now, I'm getting about 70KB/s and it's estimating roughly 2 hours
> and
> 30 mins for the first disk. At this rate, I'll have them all before i
> would
> have had even one from the speakup server.
>
> Interesting; 70kbps is about what I was seeing when I was downloading
> images
> from Bill Acker's site; when the speakup site was down.
>
> Glad I'm able to help, but it is a bit disheartening to hear about
> download
> speeds of 70kbps when my ISP (cox business services) touts an upload
> capability of 768kbps; i.e., on paper, the throughput is fully 10% of what
> it should be, or could ultimately be. Now, that having been said, the best
> throughput I was ever able to achieve by connecting to Bill's site was
> 370-380kbps, meaning that it took about a half hour to download one disk
> image.
>
> Anybody have any thoughts on why the download speed is as slow as it is,
> or
> any thoughts on how to improve it? Am now using a pentium 4 machine,
> 2.53GHz
> processor, 512MB of ram. The current plan is to upgrade this machine
> within
> the next two weeks.
>
> John
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Al Puzzuoli" <alpuzz@comcast.net>
> To: "Speakup is a screen review system for Linux."
> <speakup@braille.uwo.ca>
> Sent: Thursday, February 24, 2005 5:29 PM
> Subject: Re: Any alternate download sites for speakup ftp?
>
>
>> Thanks a lot!
>>
>> I just started downloading disk 1. Right now, I'm getting about 70KB/s
>> and it's estimating roughly 2 hours and 30 mins for the first disk. At
>> this rate, I'll have them all before i would have had even one from the
>> speakup server.
>>
>>
>> --Al
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "John McCann" <lists@jamsite.us>
>> To: "Speakup is a screen review system for Linux."
>> <speakup@braille.uwo.ca>
>> Sent: Thursday, February 24, 2005 4:43 PM
>> Subject: Re: Any alternate download sites for speakup ftp?
>>
>>
>>> Hi Al:
>>>
>>> You wrote:
>>>
>>> "For some reason, the speakup ftp server is severely slow. I am using
>>> broadband, Comcast to be exact, and each disk is taking 15 to 20 hours
>>> to
>>> complete."
>>>
>>> Tell me about it! I had that same experience over the President's day
>>> weekend; i.e., last weekend when I downloaded the 02/19/2005 set of four
>>> disks.
>>>
>>> And you continue:
>>>
>>> "Is there any alternate way to get these files, either from another
>>> server, a torrent, etc?"
>>>
>>> I've put them on my FTP server, and would love to know what kind of
>>> download speeds one gets when taking them from my site.
>>>
>>> Go to:
>>>
>>> ftp.jamsite.us/linux
>>>
>>> and give it a try. If you do, would you please respond (on or off list)
>>> with a report on the transfer rate?
>>>
>>> Thanks!
>>>
>>> John
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Speakup mailing list
>>> Speakup@braille.uwo.ca
>>> http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Speakup mailing list
>> Speakup@braille.uwo.ca
>> http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup
>>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Speakup mailing list
> Speakup@braille.uwo.ca
> http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup
next prev parent reply other threads:[~ UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
Al Puzzuoli
` John McCann
` Al Puzzuoli
` John McCann
` Al Puzzuoli [this message]
` Sina Bahram
` Farhan
` Sina Bahram
` Janina Sajka
` Sina Bahram
` Janina Sajka
` Kenny Hitt
` Janina Sajka
` Sina Bahram
` Janina Sajka
` Sina Bahram
` Sina Bahram
` Janina Sajka
` Sina Bahram
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='001101c51ad7$e0d148b0$6900a8c0@systemax' \
--to=alpuzz@comcast.net \
--cc=speakup@braille.uwo.ca \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).