Re: Consensus opinion required - was 'more worms'

["Igor Gueths" <igueths@attbi.com>]

Hi Alex. Check the security tab in internet destroyer. This is what I hate about integration! One thing affects another. I like the separation. 
----- Original Message ----- 
From: Alex Snow <alex_snow@gmx.net>
To: <speakup@braille.uwo.ca>
Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 6:46 PM
Subject: Re: Consensus opinion required - was 'more worms'


> Hi All,
> I use outlook depress to read email, since my linux box is still in pieces.
> How can I stop active x controls and other code from launching the files?
> Norton catches them only after the file is opened.  Is there any way to stop
> this?
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Igor Gueths" <igueths@attbi.com>
> To: <speakup@braille.uwo.ca>
> Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 6:12 PM
> Subject: Re: Consensus opinion required - was 'more worms'
> 
> 
> > Hi Kerry. Well said, no doubt on your statements. I remember the days back
> > when plain text was perhaps the only method for sending e-mail (late 80's
> > early 90's). Those were the good days!
> >
> > Gates go to hell, your OS is waiting for you there!
> >
> > On Wed, 15 May 2002, Charles Hallenbeck wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Kerry,
> > >
> > > No question about it, things would be a whole lot better if
> > > nobody sent html emails - I only wanted to point out that many
> > > html emails can readily be handled by pine (and perhaps other
> > > mail readers) and also that html email comes with and without
> > > viruses as do plain text emails - banning html is no protection
> > > against viruses.
> > >
> > > Chuck
> > >
> > >
> > > On Wed, 15 May 2002, Kerry Hoath wrote:
> > >
> > > > Chuck I should point out that certain versions
> > > > of pine have contained buffer overflows in the html processing
> elements
> > > > and so did older versions of mutt and lynx.
> > > > I am not taking a stand one way or the other regarding html messages
> > > > except to say that there are dangers in html;
> > > > more so for Windows users than Linux ones but the Linux dangers
> > > > exist as well.
> > > > I don't mind html if there is an equivalent plain text section,
> > > > but replying to html only messages causes me grief.
> > > > I for my own reasons choose to send to mailing lists in plain text
> > > > to minimize bandwidth usage and also message bloat.
> > > > I encourage people to set their look out distress
> > > > settings to send in plain text where possible but let it reply to a
> message
> > > > in the format it was received in.
> > > >
> > > > Regards, Kerry.
> > > > On Wed, May 15, 2002 at 09:16:13AM -0400, Charles Hallenbeck wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > I am still a pine user, and on my system pine reads html messages
> > > > > transparently, no problem. HTML has nothing to do with most
> > > > > viruses. Executable attachments that launch themselves are the
> > > > > real problem.
> > > > >
> > > > > On Wed, 15 May 2002, Steve Holmes wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Since I've been using mutt to read my mail, I really haven't been
> > > > > > affected either way with HTML mail.  When I used pine, it was an
> > > > > > annoyance but no more than that.  But I think I would favor a
> blockage
> > > > > > of HTML mail since the reasons sighted below and some people still
> use
> > > > > > windows mailers on the list; so go for it!
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Tue, May 14, 2002 at 07:48:26PM +0100, 'Georgina' wrote:
> > > > > > > Hi All
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Because of the use of html messages being used to transmit
> Windows
> > > > > > > viruses, I wondered if folks would agree to having list messages
> > > > > > > restricted to plain text only?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > The list owner will act upon whatever the consensus is.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Gena
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Have your say:
> > > > > > > Blindness Advocacy and Self Help Online www.bashonline.org
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Please don't send me MS Word documents, see
> > > > > > > http://www.fsf.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Personal Contact Details:
> > > > > > > E-mail: gena@gena-j.net WWW: http://www.gena-j.net ICQ:
> 144169465
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > > > Speakup mailing list
> > > > > > > Speakup@braille.uwo.ca
> > > > > > > http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup
> > > > > >
> > > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > > Speakup mailing list
> > > > > > Speakup@braille.uwo.ca
> > > > > > http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Visit me at http://www.valstar.net/~hallenbeck
> > > > > The Moon is Waxing Crescent (10% of Full)
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > Speakup mailing list
> > > > > Speakup@braille.uwo.ca
> > > > > http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Visit me at http://www.valstar.net/~hallenbeck
> > > The Moon is Waxing Crescent (10% of Full)
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Speakup mailing list
> > > Speakup@braille.uwo.ca
> > > http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup
> > >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Speakup mailing list
> > Speakup@braille.uwo.ca
> > http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup
> >
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Speakup mailing list
> Speakup@braille.uwo.ca
> http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup