From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from goliath.sylaba.poznan.pl ([195.216.104.3] ident=root)
	by speech.braille.uwo.ca with esmtp (Exim 3.22 #1 (Debian))
	id 156LFe-0004iM-00
	for <speakup@braille.uwo.ca>; Sat, 02 Jun 2001 19:56:15 -0400
Received: from cybertsar (ppp08.sylaba.poznan.pl [195.216.104.108])
	by goliath.sylaba.poznan.pl (8.10.1/8.10.1) with SMTP id f52NuEH18645
	for <speakup@braille.uwo.ca>; Sun, 3 Jun 2001 01:56:14 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <000e01c0ebbe$ff53f5e0$b621fea9@cybertsar>
From: "Victor Tsaran" <tsar@sylaba.poznan.pl>
To: <speakup@braille.uwo.ca>
References: <15129.31315.287375.224398@localhost.localdomain>
 <20010602161651.A286@linserver.megsinet.net>
Subject: Re: A more complete log about my disk access errors
Date: Sun, 3 Jun 2001 01:51:40 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200
Sender: speakup-admin@braille.uwo.ca
Errors-To: speakup-admin@braille.uwo.ca
X-BeenThere: speakup@braille.uwo.ca
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.4
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: speakup@braille.uwo.ca
List-Help: <mailto:speakup-request@braille.uwo.ca?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:speakup@braille.uwo.ca>
List-Subscribe: <http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup>,
	<mailto:speakup-request@braille.uwo.ca?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Speakup is a screen review system for Linux. <speakup.braille.uwo.ca>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup>,
	<mailto:speakup-request@braille.uwo.ca?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/pipermail/speakup/>

But why UltraDMA? Are DMA and UltraDMA much different from each other?
Vic

----- Original Message -----
From: "Gregory Nowak" <romualt@megsinet.net>
To: <speakup@braille.uwo.ca>
Sent: Saturday, June 02, 2001 11:16 PM
Subject: Re: A more complete log about my disk access errors


> Hi Vic,
>
> Yeah, I'd say also to check if you have ultra dma
> support in your kernel.
> Greg
>
>
> On Sat, Jun 02, 2001 at 10:44:19PM -0100, Victor Tsaran wrote:
> Content-Description: message body text
> > Hello, listers!
> > I hope those of you who are experts in kernel bugs or interaction of
kernel
> > with the hardware can help me with this. Since I installed Redhat 7.1 I
> > started to get the messages that RedHat cannot communicate through DMA
with
> > my hard drives. I know for sure that my hard drives can communicate
through
> > DMA, plus I was never getting similar messages before. Shon suggested
for
> > me to check whether UltraDMA support was compiled into my kernel, but I,
> > firstly, do not understand why it should be included into kernel, and
> > secondly, why would Redhat ignore including UltraDMA support in the
first
> > place.
> > Iam therefore attaching the complete log from the messages buffer ring
> > produced by the `dmesg' command.
> > Please let me know if you have any idea and where should I look for
> > possible solutions.
> > WIndows 2000 is very happy about my drives, whereas Linux complains
about
> > them. However, after kernel disables DMA transfer mode, it goes pretty
> > fine. Please ignore any messages about SWAP...
> > Best and thanks in advance,
> > Vic
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Speakup mailing list
> Speakup@braille.uwo.ca
> http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup
>