From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp2.commspeed.net ([216.19.2.41]) by speech.braille.uwo.ca with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1I1UHY-0001qh-00 for ; Thu, 21 Jun 2007 17:33:36 -0400 Received: (qmail 25981 invoked by uid 1034); 21 Jun 2007 21:33:05 -0000 Received: from mmds-216-19-30-69.mm.az.commspeed.net (HELO YOUR3ADE1B78A3) (216.19.30.69) by smtp2.commspeed.net with SMTP; 21 Jun 2007 21:33:05 -0000 Message-ID: <000c01c7b44b$bd058170$6401a8c0@YOUR3ADE1B78A3> From: "Keith Hinton" To: Subject: SMP/Non SMP Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2007 14:32:58 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2869 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2962 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.9 X-BeenThere: speakup@braille.uwo.ca X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list Reply-To: "Speakup is a screen review system for Linux." List-Id: "Speakup is a screen review system for Linux." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2007 21:33:37 -0000 Hi. Problem I have is I do not wish to test CVS code, for now with = Speech-Dispatcher and other applications. I would rather just disable SMP in the kernel. The question is would that reduce my performance severely with the dual = core system as I could not use the second CPU? Or, would I still get great performance, at least as a temporary = workaround until all bugs are solved for sure and a new stable release = of dispatcher is released to the public? Let me know. Regards, --Keith Skype: skypedude1234